Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No starters will play Sunday vs the Colts


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

You're right, we're doomed.  This is going to ruin the season. Teddy the great was paired with a green idiot coach and was trying to carry them.  I guess we should have kept Teddy and got a new coaching staff.

You guys are carrying your butthurt over Fields into every thing the team does.  I wish you Fields worshipers would let it go but I know you won't. 

 

 

Be careful or you'll be branded a "Sunshine Warrior", or "Cockeyed Optimist", or my favorite "Homer". lol

 

It's sad that being Optimistic, is treated like a mental illness around here. 

 

If you don't rail against any mistake. Whether real, or imagined. You might be a Homer. 

 

If you aren't critical about every move. You  might be a Homer.

 

If you don't think Rhule is in over his head. You might be a Homer.

 

If you don't believe in Doom an Gloom. You might be a Homer.

Edited by iamhubby1
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Who said we are doomed lol.   But that is the general response by some when people discuss anything about Rhule that isn’t projecting sunshine and rainbows. 

Fields has nothing to do with this sort of conversation.  Which is why I have had them about Rhule before the draft and back into last year

I'm neither sunshine and rainbows nor doom and gloom.  I'm just tired of hearing folks complain about the same tired bs.   

I am sitting squarely in the "well thats different" camp.  I will reserve my criticism or congratulations after it all plays out.  I am not a fortune teller and neither are you.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm neither sunshine and rainbows nor doom and gloom.  I'm just tired of hearing folks complain about the same tired bs.   

I am sitting squarely in the "well thats different" camp.  I will reserve my criticism or congratulations after it all plays out.  I am not a fortune teller and neither are you.

 

I was just about to tell you how much I admire your patience in this thread. But it looks like it may just be fraying at the end just a little bit. lol

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DID I heard this right- Rhule also said Darnold playing in the 2nd game is up in the air???

I hope we hire a full ref team and pull in ear pieces and send players groups in for adjustments and  thousand other things this team needs for game day that practice can not replicate... Someone please notify Rhule that hes coaching in the NFL and week 1 is less than 30 days away.....  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm neither sunshine and rainbows nor doom and gloom.  I'm just tired of hearing folks complain about the same tired bs.   

I am sitting squarely in the "well thats different" camp.  I will reserve my criticism or congratulations after it all plays out.  I am not a fortune teller and neither are you.

How is this the same tried bs though? Or are you just talking about being critical of Rhule?

I just think it is an odd enough call to question Rhule on it.   He is very green so things are going to happen.   

Not thinking your 24 year old QB who is brand new and hasn’t been a very good QB to date….doesn’t need preseason game 1 or 2 is unusual enough to call out IMO. 

I mean, the case could be made Sam is once again not being out in the best position to succeed.  His QB room sucks.  His OL sucks.  And now we are holding him out of game simulation reps which isn’t the norm for someone like him.  I know I know….great weapons and Joe Brady.  Those are great things he hasn’t had.   But some of Sam’s issues have always been Sam.  

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

How is this the same tried bs though? Or are you just talking about being critical of Rhule?

I just think it is an odd enough call to question Rhule on it.   He is very green so things are going to happen.   

Not thinking your 24 year old QB who is brand new and hasn’t been a very good QB to date….doesn’t need preseason game 1 or 2 is unusual enough to call out IMO. 

I mean, the case could be made Sam is once again not being out in the best position to succeed.  His QB room sucks.  His OL sucks.  And now we are holding him out of game simulation reps which isn’t the norm for someone like him.  I know I know….great weapons and Joe Brady.  Those are great things he hasn’t had.   But some of Sam’s issues have always been Sam.  

You are assuming all that to be true.  It's the same tired cry that you know more about football and it's going to end badly.  Not a single game has been played yet.  

Nothing has been proved or disproved at this point. It will not be settled until the last game is played.  Try to enjoy the wins when they come and not grip about how they won.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

DID I heard this right- Rhule also said Darnold playing in the 2nd game is up in the air???

I hope we hire a full ref team and pull in ear pieces and send players groups in for adjustments and  thousand other things this team needs for game day that practice can not replicate... Someone please notify Rhule that hes coaching in the NFL and week 1 is less than 30 days away.....  

Rhule and questionable decisions seem to go together. 
I feel like he thinks vets don’t need real time reps and that the preseason is just for fringe players. 
If Darnold doesn’t play at all during the preseason we are going to see real rust and sloppy play. We may lose against the Jets because of it. 
Practice time and real game time aren’t the same thing and someone needs to explain this to Rhule. 
Darnold needs reps. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Rhule and questionable decisions seem to go together. 
I feel like he thinks vets don’t need real time reps and that the preseason is just for fringe players. 
If Darnold doesn’t play at all during the preseason we are going to see real rust and sloppy play. We may lose against the Jets because of it. 
Practice time and real game time aren’t the same thing and someone needs to explain this to Rhule. 
Darnold needs reps. 

I agree.

Rhule- " Im not putting Darnold out there without starting OL "

Bas- " Ok heres the solution- play the starting OL!! "

Rhule-Season 16 What GIF by America's Got Talent

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

You are assuming all that to be true.  It's the same tired cry that you know more about football and it's going to end badly.  Not a single game has been played yet.  

Nothing has been proved or disproved at this point. It will not be settled until the last game is played.  Try to enjoy the wins when they come and not grip about how they won.

 

Fear of the past impedes your moving forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...