Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No starters will play Sunday vs the Colts


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

You're right, we're doomed.  This is going to ruin the season. Teddy the great was paired with a green idiot coach and was trying to carry them.  I guess we should have kept Teddy and got a new coaching staff.

You guys are carrying your butthurt over Fields into every thing the team does.  I wish you Fields worshipers would let it go but I know you won't. 

 

 

Be careful or you'll be branded a "Sunshine Warrior", or "Cockeyed Optimist", or my favorite "Homer". lol

 

It's sad that being Optimistic, is treated like a mental illness around here. 

 

If you don't rail against any mistake. Whether real, or imagined. You might be a Homer. 

 

If you aren't critical about every move. You  might be a Homer.

 

If you don't think Rhule is in over his head. You might be a Homer.

 

If you don't believe in Doom an Gloom. You might be a Homer.

Edited by iamhubby1
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Who said we are doomed lol.   But that is the general response by some when people discuss anything about Rhule that isn’t projecting sunshine and rainbows. 

Fields has nothing to do with this sort of conversation.  Which is why I have had them about Rhule before the draft and back into last year

I'm neither sunshine and rainbows nor doom and gloom.  I'm just tired of hearing folks complain about the same tired bs.   

I am sitting squarely in the "well thats different" camp.  I will reserve my criticism or congratulations after it all plays out.  I am not a fortune teller and neither are you.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm neither sunshine and rainbows nor doom and gloom.  I'm just tired of hearing folks complain about the same tired bs.   

I am sitting squarely in the "well thats different" camp.  I will reserve my criticism or congratulations after it all plays out.  I am not a fortune teller and neither are you.

 

I was just about to tell you how much I admire your patience in this thread. But it looks like it may just be fraying at the end just a little bit. lol

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DID I heard this right- Rhule also said Darnold playing in the 2nd game is up in the air???

I hope we hire a full ref team and pull in ear pieces and send players groups in for adjustments and  thousand other things this team needs for game day that practice can not replicate... Someone please notify Rhule that hes coaching in the NFL and week 1 is less than 30 days away.....  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm neither sunshine and rainbows nor doom and gloom.  I'm just tired of hearing folks complain about the same tired bs.   

I am sitting squarely in the "well thats different" camp.  I will reserve my criticism or congratulations after it all plays out.  I am not a fortune teller and neither are you.

How is this the same tried bs though? Or are you just talking about being critical of Rhule?

I just think it is an odd enough call to question Rhule on it.   He is very green so things are going to happen.   

Not thinking your 24 year old QB who is brand new and hasn’t been a very good QB to date….doesn’t need preseason game 1 or 2 is unusual enough to call out IMO. 

I mean, the case could be made Sam is once again not being out in the best position to succeed.  His QB room sucks.  His OL sucks.  And now we are holding him out of game simulation reps which isn’t the norm for someone like him.  I know I know….great weapons and Joe Brady.  Those are great things he hasn’t had.   But some of Sam’s issues have always been Sam.  

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

How is this the same tried bs though? Or are you just talking about being critical of Rhule?

I just think it is an odd enough call to question Rhule on it.   He is very green so things are going to happen.   

Not thinking your 24 year old QB who is brand new and hasn’t been a very good QB to date….doesn’t need preseason game 1 or 2 is unusual enough to call out IMO. 

I mean, the case could be made Sam is once again not being out in the best position to succeed.  His QB room sucks.  His OL sucks.  And now we are holding him out of game simulation reps which isn’t the norm for someone like him.  I know I know….great weapons and Joe Brady.  Those are great things he hasn’t had.   But some of Sam’s issues have always been Sam.  

You are assuming all that to be true.  It's the same tired cry that you know more about football and it's going to end badly.  Not a single game has been played yet.  

Nothing has been proved or disproved at this point. It will not be settled until the last game is played.  Try to enjoy the wins when they come and not grip about how they won.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

DID I heard this right- Rhule also said Darnold playing in the 2nd game is up in the air???

I hope we hire a full ref team and pull in ear pieces and send players groups in for adjustments and  thousand other things this team needs for game day that practice can not replicate... Someone please notify Rhule that hes coaching in the NFL and week 1 is less than 30 days away.....  

Rhule and questionable decisions seem to go together. 
I feel like he thinks vets don’t need real time reps and that the preseason is just for fringe players. 
If Darnold doesn’t play at all during the preseason we are going to see real rust and sloppy play. We may lose against the Jets because of it. 
Practice time and real game time aren’t the same thing and someone needs to explain this to Rhule. 
Darnold needs reps. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Rhule and questionable decisions seem to go together. 
I feel like he thinks vets don’t need real time reps and that the preseason is just for fringe players. 
If Darnold doesn’t play at all during the preseason we are going to see real rust and sloppy play. We may lose against the Jets because of it. 
Practice time and real game time aren’t the same thing and someone needs to explain this to Rhule. 
Darnold needs reps. 

I agree.

Rhule- " Im not putting Darnold out there without starting OL "

Bas- " Ok heres the solution- play the starting OL!! "

Rhule-Season 16 What GIF by America's Got Talent

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

You are assuming all that to be true.  It's the same tired cry that you know more about football and it's going to end badly.  Not a single game has been played yet.  

Nothing has been proved or disproved at this point. It will not be settled until the last game is played.  Try to enjoy the wins when they come and not grip about how they won.

 

Fear of the past impedes your moving forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...