Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question...what if P.J is better then S D?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 It’s pretty straightforward. Busts didn’t get 2nd contracts. Pretty simple. Wentz(who I forgot) is like Tannehill and Goff. All played well enough for the team that drafted them to invest a franchise QB deal in them. And I still didn’t include them in either list. 
 

   As opposed to whatever jumble of reasoning you just put out there. My parameters are very clear. You have a better measurement. Please share with us all. Not a single data point. A large sample size.

Oh.  I didn't realize our whole goal was to find a QB that could earn a 2nd contract.   Carry on then.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

I'm enjoying this banter. 🙃

When we get to actual football season some of the TB aholes rear their ugly head.    I put him on ignore, tired of looking at his ugly ass stealers ring.  He can feel free to rail away like an idiot against the mute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

When we get to actual football season some of the TB aholes rear their ugly head.    I put him on ignore, tired of looking at his ugly ass stealers ring.  He can feel free to rail away like an idiot against the mute.

 Never been to the TB and whatever keeps you happy and delusional, you should do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

While Rhule also added that he’s undecided on if the team’s starters will be a go, it’ll be nice (and fair) to see Grier at least work with the likes of Terrace Marshall Jr., Omar Bayless and Tommy Tremble, as P.J. Walker did in his largely positive performance

That last part...lol

All this proves they rather go with Grier>Darnold

 

mad-angry.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

While Rhule also added that he’s undecided on if the team’s starters will be a go, it’ll be nice (and fair) to see Grier at least work with the likes of Terrace Marshall Jr., Omar Bayless and Tommy Tremble, as P.J. Walker did in his largely positive performance

That last part...lol

All this proves they rather go with Grier>Darnold

 

mad-angry.gif

It was largely positive because the expectations from last season were dirt low. They are literally saying 10/21 is a positive performance for him.

Darnold is the starter, not going to change unless somebody gets injured. 
 

Grier/Walker are both below average back up QBs.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

It was largely positive because the expectations from last season were dirt low. They are literally saying 10/21 is a positive performance for him.

Darnold is the starter, not going to change unless somebody gets injured. 
 

Grier/Walker are both below average back up QBs.

Question: When is Darnold going actually start ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

Question: When is Darnold going actually start ????

Weeks 1-17 of the regular season. That is typically when starting QBs play. This reduces the chances of losing your starting QB to injury during the preseason and increases your chances of success by starting your most qualified signal caller during the games that impact your record.

Now since that has been explained, let’s take a second to address your grammar on that post.

”Question: When is Darnold going actually start ????”

The correct way to ask this question would be “When do you think Darnold is going to actually start?” OR “I have a question, when is Darnold going to start?”

Phrasing is this way makes it easier for the reader. Also there is an excess of punctuation that is not necessary.

Edited by Cdparr7
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

It was largely positive because the expectations from last season were dirt low. They are literally saying 10/21 is a positive performance for him.

Darnold is the starter, not going to change unless somebody gets injured. 
 

Grier/Walker are both below average back up QBs.

PJ Walker lead the offense to 4 scoring drives in a half.  Pretty sure that is positive, especially given it was the first action on the year and he only has 1 NFL start to his name. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

PJ Walker lead the offense to 4 scoring drives in a half.  Pretty sure that is positive, especially given it was the first action on the year and he only has 1 NFL start to his name. 

And don't forget Darnold's getting all the practice reps, so he had very few chances to prove himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. It was an obvious red flag that a lot of people ignored. The results/scores in preseason don’t matter, but individual performance very much does and individually, we looked like the least talented team in the league and it carried over.
    • Sorry, but in 2015, we didn’t look like poo to the extent of 2023. People who said it’s just preseason were completely wrong. Simple as that. 2015 was a veteran lead team. It was Cam’s 5th year and Luke’s 4th. Even our OL was 80% the same (added Oher) as the great run to finish 2014 with a playoff win. That year can be labeled as preseason doesn’t matter because I’m sure we rested vets and well, Ron/Mike weren’t putting in special plays, etc. I absolutely don’t recall a bunch of us saying that Turner was getting killed on one on ones or that Luke was completely out of position or that Norman was hurt again but probably fine. The only thing that was right about the 2023 preseason is that the minority of us who saw it, were correct that we A) should have been making Young and others play 100% of the reps as there was nothing to hide and B) the preseason means nothing was a bunch of BS trying to stay optimistic when it was obvious that we had way less good talent than the rest of the NFL.
    • You are telling me Paul Maurice is a better coach than Rod??? Yes!!!  It’s because he plays a better system and has a better goalie.   Our system sucks in playoffs and he refuses to roll with Koochie. Dallas cowboys level poo 
×
×
  • Create New...