Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers - Baltimore Ravens Joint Practice 1


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

So it doesn't matter an NFL team can't sell the QB1 jerseys....Tepper on line 1

No it does not matter. The NFL has a revenue sharing model in a license agreement with Nike and New Era. This means that ALL NFL apparel, no matter the team, that is sold is split across all teams. The only team that is not within this revenue sharing model is the Cowboys. They are considered "Whoelsellers" of their brand and product. Cowboys actually own their own warehouse and distrubutor of their prioduct, so they are not obligated to share their apparel revenue with the NFL or other teams. 

 

So I highly doubt Tepper care about jersey sales via Nike, because he only gets a small slice of the pie. This is why you see other types of apparel outside of Nike/New Era, pushed by NFL teams. They actually get the majority of the pie as opposed to jersey sales.

shooting star GIF

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

That reminds me, I need to get a CMC jersey. I was supposed to get one last season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

No it does not matter. The NFL has a revenue sharing model in a license agreement with Nike and New Era. This means that ALL NFL apparel, no matter the team, that is sold is split across all teams. The only team that is not within this revenue sharing model is the Cowboys. They are considered "Whoelsellers" of their brand and product. Cowboys actually own their own warehouse and distrubutor of their prioduct, so they are not obligated to share their apparel revenue with the NFL or other teams. 

 

So I highly doubt Tepper care about jersey sales via Nike, because he only gets a small slice of the pie. This is why you see other types of apparel outside of Nike/New Era, pushed by NFL teams. They actually get the majority of the pie as opposed to jersey sales.

shooting star GIF

Very informative...but a team that has a hard time selling their starting QB jersey says alot about fan support...which translates to ticket sells, etc...

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

Very informative...but a team that has a hard time selling their starting QB jersey says alot about fan support...which translates to ticket sells, etc...

CMC leads the way in jersey sales for us, he is in the top 50. Take into consideration that most of the top ten (8) are all rookie jerseys.  At least we are not the  Falcons, Texans, Colts, and Lions who has zero jersey sales in the top 50. Falcons highest selling jersey this year is Julio Jones, which is laughable.

 

Btw...  QB jersey sales doesnt determine ticket sales... only one thing does.... Winning. 

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...