Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PREDICTIONS - How will Sam Darnold do against the Ravens


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I think this season is about figuring out the QB position.  The next offseason will be critical if Sam Darnold is not a revelation 

Yeah, Sam will need to make his best case this season for being signed to a long term contract.  Otherwise, we'll be in the same situation we were with Cam two years ago, reluctant to commit big dollars to someone we weren't sure was the answer at QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be an average so/so performance consisting of 1 or 2 series that will lead to overreaction and divisiveness in the Huddle Universe

half the board will rip Darnold by only looking at the bad passes or decisions.

half the board will anoint him and buy fake “100% authentic” jerseys due to a couple highlight plays

half will look at the stat lines and rip him because it was just average so/so

In simple terms, a normal Huddle weekend had by all.  

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Shocker said:

I think this season is about figuring out the QB position.  The next offseason will be critical if Sam Darnold is not a revelation 

If Darnold fails, I will be curious to see if the FO/staff continues to believe that dumpster diving is the path to finding a QB. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...