Notes about Perryman and depth

[Shocker]

54 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

I get that, but this staff is going to find us a QB. If it's obvious it's not Darnold, they'll move on quickly. We could end up like the Bucs. Stacked roster, find the missing piece, then championships. It would be even better if we won a SB with our own young QB rather than a geriatric rental that's going to have his number retired up North.

Absolutely key point on the QB…the Rhule/Fitty era depends on QB.  I think they realize that

Fitty has shown us already how to get talent.  A franchise QB is a tough get though 

Edited August 21, 2021 by Shocker

[top dawg]

44 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

I get that, but this staff is going to find us a QB. If it's obvious it's not Darnold, they'll move on quickly. We could end up like the Bucs. Stacked roster, find the missing piece, then championships. It would be even better if we won a SB with our own young QB rather than a geriatric rental that's going to have his number retired up North.

I just hate the process, which would be even more frustrating if some of the QBs of the 2021 draft turn out to be really special. Darnold would be whiff number two in as many years if you believe they'll move quickly in the event that he fails. 

[Shocker]

Against the scrubs but Hoskins was camping up in the backfield last game

[WarPanthers89]

12 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Absolutely key point on the QB…the Rhule/Fitty era depends on QB.  I think they realize that

Fitty has shown us already how to get talent.  A franchise QB is a tough get though 

Agreed. I still get pissed that the team site posted that the depth was 2-5 years ahead of us…… QB aside.  What a joke esp after Fitty nailed his first draft with us

[kungfoodude]

1 hour ago, t96 said:

Not putting a ton of stock in preseason, but our 2s did outplay the Colts’ 2s (and some of their starters I believe)... Pretty ridiculous to suggest we could be “5 years behind them.”

It isn't at all ridiculous. Not only are they more deep and more talented but much more importantly, far more experienced. 2-5 years behind them isn't hard to believe at all. 

[t96]

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

It isn't at all ridiculous. Not only are they more deep and more talented but much more importantly, far more experienced. 2-5 years behind them isn't hard to believe at all. 

I would not be the least bit surprised if we have a better record than the Colts this year.

[kungfoodude]

1 minute ago, t96 said:

I would not be the least bit surprised if we have a better record than the Colts this year.

If their injury woes keep getting worse, it's possible. It's not a bet I would personally make, especially being in the same division as the Jags and Texans. 

[Shocker]

13 minutes ago, t96 said:

I would not be the least bit surprised if we have a better record than the Colts this year.

We will…we have a better roster than the Colts overall.  If their OL is full strength I will eat those words but doubt it

[cardiackat88.]

18 hours ago, hepcat said:

If he’s just gonna be an injury prone backup cut his ass and find a young hungry LB that was cut from another team

Also is super outspoken about being anti-vax, he's just a pain in the ass that needs to be cut.

[hepcat]

9 minutes ago, cardiackat88. said:

Also is super outspoken about being anti-vax, he's just a pain in the ass that needs to be cut.

Maybe that's why he's being held out. Rhule in a stand off with him to get the vax