Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun maybe to the PANTHERS?!?! What?!!


Vader704
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

I bet you cannot find anything proving he didn't do anything try to provide the proof and if not stop spouting off with this nonsense you are posting here.

The proof of nothingness does not exist and by virtue can not be proven.  This is the very reason that the burden of proof is ALWAYS on the accuser and not the accused. 

 

People these days are complete ignoramuses. 

 

Disclaimer: I'm neither for nor against and hold no vested interests in Mr. Watson's innocence or guilt.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may have been posted. I really do not care to read through this thread to find out.  Just in case:

https://www.si.com/nfl/2021/08/28/deshaun-watson-dolphins-emerge-as-frontrunner-in-trade-discussions


 

Quote

 

 The Panthers, Broncos and Eagles had previously been rumored to be involved in discussions in some way, per Robinson, but on Saturday, The Charlotte Observer, Athletic and CBS Sports reported that Carolina is not exploring trading for Watson at this time. 

"Watson’s contractual right to approve the trade destination—which was signed off on by Houston ownership in his last extension—has weighed heavily in trade opportunities," Robinson tweeted. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Poon_Flavored_Tang said:

The proof of nothingness does not exist and by virtue can not be proven.  This is the very reason that the burden of proof is ALWAYS on the accuser and not the accused. 

 

People these days are complete ignoramuses. 

 

Disclaimer: I'm neither for nor against and hold no vested interests in Mr. Watson's innocence or guilt.  

Whatever you say clown noob kid. Making insults towards someone must make you a big boy that has no clue what you are talking about.

Edited by PantherOnTheProwl1523
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ace420 said:

Well good thing the constitution puts the burden of proof on the prosecutor, not the defense.

It is scary world when people dont know anything about American freedoms anymore and want to imprison people due to media coverage. Good think you aren't his judge... 

Whatever you say Ass420

Edited by PantherOnTheProwl1523
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...