Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

State of the NFL


run-run-pass-punt
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

OL play hasnt gone down as much as DL play has gone up

you now have 300 lb DL running 4.3

level of athletism is just off the charts

I agree that defensive linemen are more athletic than before, but that was also true back in the days of guys like Reggie White and Bruce Smith.

The quality of blocking all across the league has taken a real downturn in at least the last decade or so.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Was talking with LG about that too.

Even there though, the reality is that while there are plenty of reasonably mobile quarterbacks, there are precious few true "dual threat" quarterbacks.

Honestly, outside of Lamar Jackson, who in the league right now would a defensive coordinator have to account for as a possible dangerous run threat?

Kyler Murray

Josh Allen

Russell Wilson

Jalen Hurts 

 

    

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I agree that defensive linemen are more athletic than before, but that was also true back in the days of guys like Reggie White and Bruce Smith.

The quality of blocking all across the league has taken a real downturn in at least the last decade or so.

Honestly, I think this will be a big focus of the next set of rule tweaks. OL play is down. Partly because all the jumbo athletes want to play defense and partly because today's spread offenses put more pressure on the OL and expose them a lot more to working in space.

QBs are the highest paid position in the NFL by a pretty wide margin. Owners hate seeing their QBs take hits and fans hate to see their QBs get hurt. I think we'll see holding on the OL either get deemphasized or get the letter of the rule outright changed to give the OL an advantage.

Just a hunch.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

Kyler Murray

Josh Allen

Russell Wilson

Jalen Hurts 

 

    

Murray is a great point.  Didn't he have double digit rushing TDs last year too?

I mean hell, Daniel Jones and Watson each had >400 yards on the ground and rushing TDs.  You better believe D coordinators are accounting for that mobility, even if it isn't the same as Murray and Jackson.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think we'll see holding on the OL either get deemphasized or get the letter of the rule outright changed to give the OL an advantage.

You sure it hasn't been already?

I saw an awful lot of holding go uncalled last night. At times, it was like watching Jon Runyan play every position on the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, hepcat said:

There are other reasons I'm losing interest in the NFL than just strictly how much passing teams are doing now.

1) The games take way too long and the commercial breaks seem to get longer and louder. Actual NFL gameplay is only like 11 minutes total. Compared to MLS which I am getting more and more into, it's a crazy difference. MLS games have commercials only at halftime and it's constant action for 90+ minutes.

 

 Yeah, I don't want to make this a thread about "what sport is better" as that is very subjective of course, but soccer and baseball are my favorite sports. When there is less of something, there is generally a higher value associated with it. For me, soccer maintains constant tension, and I just really love the game. I understand why some find it boring, but not to me.

49 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

There is a certain degree of tension that is lost when you just kind of expect that the offense is going to move down the field and score on most possessions. This isn’t every game or every offense, obviously, but it’s enough.

 Yes, it often feels like a foregone conclusion. The ball is going to be moved, and with relative ease most of the time. It just saps any tension, as you said.

1 hour ago, AviationMX said:

Same could said about MLB, players are paid for the long ball. Averages are secondary and few teams play station to station anymore.  The NHL has less fights, but I'm OK with that.

To the OP's point-Maybe the passing game is why Horn was picked as opposed to another player.😉

Don't get  me started on baseball, lol. I miss the small ball of the 80's (and other eras) so much. At least we had the 2015 Royals who were an anomaly - winning the title with small ball when everyone else was crushing the long ball or striking out, and it's only getting worse. What a great team and series that was - even the year prior against the Giants.

Lots of interesting opinions in the thread. Appreciate the replies.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I wouldn't put any of those guys in the Cam Newton tier of run threats.

Allen is probably the closest.

I missed the part where they had to be specifically like Cam. I responded to what would a DC have to account for. The actual question YOU asked. 
 

You think OC don’t account for their “mobility” on every play? There are others on way. Lawrence, Fields, and Lance. 
 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Would you spy him though?

That to me is the threshold for determining a true dual threat QB.

The problem with a spy against some of those guys is that they are too fast for them lol.  Teams have used spies vs Murray though.  He is widely regarded as a dual threat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Panthers Huddle is usually just propaganda …this one was actually good im feeling good about the Morgan and Canales marriage  the proof is ‘in the pudding’ however  …and have to remember a first time head coach and players who have never played together before but they can’t possibly be worse than last year  the wild card to all this,  too,  is Young  I wish I felt better about him but I don’t  Morgan says he wants ‘dawgs’ not ‘dogs’ I.e. pit bulls vs poodles…I see young as the latter, not the former  Regardless, life is full of surprises…maybe he is a lot more than I see.  I’m not a scout or coach 
    • There are a lot of moving parts to this type of questions and way too many variables to consider to really predict how the outcome would have been any different in 2023 with Dalton starting more than just one game.  But instead of focusing on that Seattle game, another game, and the game following it, are more intriguing to me.   Week 16 vs Green Bay.  Young had the best game of his rookie season.  23/36 (64%) for 312 with 2 TD and no INT.  Thielen (6/94), Chark (6/98) and Tremble (4/59) all had huge plays in the passing game. The running game was a different story.  Hubbard (16/43) and Sanders (3/3) combined for just 46 yards rushing.  Mays was starting at LG and Jensen at RG.  The offensive line was able to protect Young just enough to keep the Panthers in the game until the very end.  But this wasn't because they were playing at a high level, rather the Packers defense played horrible this game. But this horrible defensive effort by the Packers allowed us to see what could be possible if Young had time to process and throw. Fast forward to Week 17 vs Jacksonville.  The offense was shut out and the offensive line allowed 6 sacks and 8 more QH's.   If you go back and watch these games back to back, the line play if very noticeable.  When Young had time in process and move, he was spot on.  When the line collapsed, like most QBs, he was ineffective. When you draft a QB 1st overall in the draft, especially if you trade up to do so, you hope to get a QB that can make plays despite the struggles around him.  Think Newton his rookie year.  Should the Panthers have traded up in the 2023 draft to the 1st overall and should they have drafted Young at that spot? My opinion is no to the first question and no QB in 2023 was worth trading up to take in the top 10.  Neither Stroud, Richardson or Levis would have been worth it.   But none of them would have fared any better than Young either with the Panthers, in my opinion.  Stroud had a good season in Houston but he didn't have a Cam Newton or Lamar Jackson season.  He needed slightly above average talent in one of the worst divisions to make the playoffs. He had the season we were hoping for in Carolina but wasn't going to get with Young or Stroud. Now, I'm not trying to put Young up on a pedestal here.  There are a lot of questions that still surround him and his ability to be QB1 on the Panthers in the future.  But the issue last year wasn't just the play at the QB position.  And really, I don't think the WR issues were as much as people make them out to be.  The real issue on this offense was the line and the running game.  If your line can't get a push to run the ball or pass block to pass the ball, you have no offense.   Start Young. Start Dalton.  Draft Stroud, Richardson or Levis.  Kidnap Mahomes.  Doesn't matter, I think the end result would have been the same. 
    • If there’s any year to be aggressive with it, it’s this one.
×
×
  • Create New...