Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Same Ole Jameis


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, frankw said:

Criticism of his on field performance or off the field legal troubles is fair game but this stuff about IQ and crab legs is cringy af.

i think it's more he's just super cringey. nothing will ever beat that time he ate the W in front of his dumbfounded teammates 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ccclaws said:

You’re conflating football intelligence with normal cognitive ability. Besides, him scoring a 6 on the wonderlic doesn’t necessarily mean he was stupid since your not accounting for him getting smarter.

You're the only one talking about "football intelligence". I simply stated Jameis is brick dumb. He is. The off field stuff is relevant to that statement. Him constantly getting confused and throwing the football to the other team is too.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

i think it's more he's just super cringey. nothing will ever beat that time he ate the W in front of his dumbfounded teammates 

I can't argue with that. I just want to defeat the Saints and smug ass Sean Payton. We haven't popped them in the mouth proper in years and them sweeping us and rubbing our noses in it with Ted Ginn still stings. Tbh this weekend is one of the biggest home games I can recall in years. No Brees? We're finally fielding a good defense again? CMC is healthy? We have receiving weapons? This W needs to happen.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years, with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
    • Laughing at Slayton (Mooney or Calvin Austin III), but telling me that Coker is the next best thing since sliced bread...You laughing at Theo Johnson in reference to our guys too? LOL No one in their right mind thinks Nabers is anything but a stud (definitely top 10 if not 5 potential). You do realize that Thomas was in a new system with a furst-time coach last year (with a questionable QB to boot)? And yet still, it's possible that he eclipses even T-mac (not saying that he will). They didn't even mention Travis Hunter. In any event, we're not in the top half. Draft another legit receiver, and we will be. 
    • Absolutely, very fair assessment of the team. 
×
×
  • Create New...