Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Saints at Panthers Predictions thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

If you were a Saints fan through the non-Brees years, that is legit as it comes. That is one of the worst franchises in NFL history. Plenty of banwagoners in the fanbase now but putting in that time as a Saints fan is legit AF.

The base is there and strong.  I see Saints gear everywhere every day and have for as long as I can remember.  The Dome Patrol years were both great and frustrating.  We had the most dominating defense in league history and no offense.  This type of management is what generated the brief and small "bag head" protest of 1980-81.  It was not directed toward the players at all.  It was directed toward management for not spending the money to legitimately compete.  But that is a whole story in itself.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AsylumGuido said:

The base is there and strong.  I see Saints gear everywhere every day and have for as long as I can remember.  The Dome Patrol years were both great and frustrating.  We had the most dominating defense in league history and no offense.  This type of management is what generated the brief and small "bag head" protest of 1980-81.  It was not directed toward the players at all.  It was directed toward management for not spending the money to legitimately compete.  But that is a whole story in itself.   

Not even being a little bit of a homer there? Top 20 sure top 15? possibly no chance it was the most dominating, that's blatant homerism the most dominating defenses in NFL history carried their teams to titles, 2000 Ravens, 2002 Buccaneers, 1985 Bears,1976 Steelers. . ect 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Not even being a little bit of a homer there? Top 20 sure top 15? possibly no chance it was the most dominating, that's blatant homerism the most dominating defenses in NFL history carried their teams to titles, 2000 Ravens, 2002 Buccaneers, 1985 Bears,1976 Steelers. . ect 

Yawn!

The Saints had Sam Mills in his prime and he was arguably the fourth best LB on the starting defense.  And he was great.  Swilling, Johnson, Jackson, and Mills.  The Dome Patrol.

Edited by AsylumGuido
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AsylumGuido said:

The base is there and strong.  I see Saints gear everywhere every day and have for as long as I can remember.  The Dome Patrol years were both great and frustrating.  We had the most dominating defense in league history and no offense.  This type of management is what generated the brief and small "bag head" protest of 1980-81.  It was not directed toward the players at all.  It was directed toward management for not spending the money to legitimately compete.  But that is a whole story in itself.   

As a divisional rival with recent success, the Saints are easily hateable. But, in reality they aren't that different than Bengals, Browns, Bills fans. If you slogged through all that poo and are still a fan, that says a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

As a divisional rival with recent success, the Saints are easily hateable. But, in reality they aren't that different than Bengals, Browns, Bills fans. If you slogged through all that poo and are still a fan, that says a lot.

But at least we aren't the Falcons.  Now that is a mess.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

As a divisional rival with recent success, the Saints are easily hateable. But, in reality they aren't that different than Bengals, Browns, Bills fans. If you slogged through all that poo and are still a fan, that says a lot.

We haven't had it much better so...fug the Saints. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AsylumGuido said:

Realize, this was over 45 years ago.  You probably weren't alive.  I will admit, however, that the cream at the top was definitely at a far greater height than the mean.

However, 600 was well below my lower half.  

You graduated high school over 45 years ago?  Holy poo how are you still alive?!?!?!?

 

(sarcasm fyi)

 

Seriously though, you have to be older than our DC.  Ok Gramps.  Now that fruit butt thing in the other thread really was weird. 🤮

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Obviously the new FO has only been in charge for a couple years but they have not broken from past trends.  
    • Rookie Bryce: Mingo, Thielen, DJ Chark as his WRs ...we won 2 games.  2nd Year Bryce: XL is drafted and becomes Bryce's #1 target in 24...we won 5 games (kinda suprising tho) 3rd Year Bryce: Tmac is drafted and becomes Bryce's #1 with Coker in the mix in '25.. we managed to win the division and make the playoffs. ..8 wins 4th Year Bryce: TBD ..... but we do need another reliable option at the position. Maybe not at 19 (unless its Cooper or Lemon) but somewhere within the top 100.   We are one injury away from reverting back to 23-24 status or worse. And if we dont happen to get substantial gains after this draft atleast we'll have the offense in a great spot to drop in our future QB.  Tmac, Coker, Leggette, Horn Jr, Metchie. I'd be willing to rock with the above but they could def stand an upgrade. An argument could be made at TE too.   
    • You're also underestimating Calipari in those scenarios. Calipari can say to a kid "I've put more impactful players into the NBA than any school over the last 20 years".  Michael Malone can tout that he was run out of the NBA for not understanding impactful players.  I wouldn't count any chickens yet on top recruiting classes and deep tournament runs.  On a side note, can't remember where, but saw some interview where the guy was saying the NBA All Star Game should be the USA vs World vs Kentucky - and then proceeded to list the players in the league from Kentucky who would legit give an All Star team a run for their money.  Pretty impressive what Cal did at Kentucky, not impressive on him not getting more nattys.
×
×
  • Create New...