Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next year's 1st for Laremy Tunsil who says no?


RIPTreyLance
 Share

Recommended Posts

Now that we've got this Texans game out of the way they should have no reason to want to withhold him from us if given the right offer.

He was tossing Brian burns around last night like he was a ragdoll. We are 31st in pass block rating in the NFL.  Perfect storm? 

If we're just going to draft a tackle next year anyway I don't see why not...

  • Poo 29
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/laremy-tunsil/10647
 

I mean he has given up 0 sacks and has no penalties but I do think they over paid for him in terms of the two first rounders. Doubt we get a better OT in round one next year given that we'll be drafting at least around 20+ so I don't see why people would say it's a dumb idea considering he's 27.

He restructured his deal and I don't know what that entails but the money could be what funks it up? I don't care enough to look up his salary but the ability is there and the value is too if the money isn't goofed.

But also probably around a 100% chance they don't do it though...like why would they trade one of the best pass blockers.

 

Edited by Fox007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fox007 said:

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/laremy-tunsil/10647
 

I mean he has given up 0 sacks and has no penalties but I do think they over paid for him in terms of the two first rounders. Doubt we get a better OT in round one next year given that we'll be drafting at least around 20+ so I don't see why people would say it's a dumb idea considering he's 27.

He restructured his deal and I don't know what that entaisl but the money could be what funks it up? I don't care enough to look up his salary but the ability is there and the value is too if the money isn't goofed.

But also probably around a 100% chance they don't do it though...like why would they trade one of the best pass blockers.

 

They're heading into rebuild mode. Tunsils ability won't help the team enough to win anyway. And they could fetch more picks for the rebuild 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...