Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'm sorry but this isn't a winning record team.


Snake
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Fug Drump said:

What is a pressing situation to a "good team"??  Yall feel that the Panthers are a good team, correct???  Or were they over-inflated with a 3-0 record due to playing against three bad teams???  If you are a good team, then those weren't pressing situations.

Any time you have a  fumble that was not called that would have given the Panthers great field position but let Dallas retain position and drive for a score was bad. Add on the obivious one side penalities called against the Panthers and the no calls against Dallas, putting the Panthers in situations that would be called pressing were hard for the Panthers ( or other good teams)  to overcome. To disallow that this had a negative effect on the games outcome would be foolish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Make the playoffs? Don't know. A lot of factors that we don't control go into that.

Winning record though? Yeah that's very possible.

It's also very possible that we end up sub. 500. Yes we can look past this loss and we play less competition but that's not given. Dallas wasn't a fluke game more a game that exposed our weaknesses. Something the coaching staff couldn't overcome. I think beating up on lesser competition made us look like a legitimate team. I think we are a rebuilding team. Time will tell who's the "dumb" one in this. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Honestly, he should've hoped that we win, but suspected that we lose. That was a tough order with Horn and CMC out (and still not overwhelmingly promising with them in).

It was a winnable game until we got out coached. Plenty of blame why they couldn't have adjusted but we were winning at half time. I'm not overy upset we are not a winning team year two. We have came a long way. We will progress and have our time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

unfortunately, Scots contribution to this board has devolved to calling other people’s posts dumb.

Yup and mine isn't that out worldly. We seriously had someone state we are a legendary Defense before we got cleaned up. There has been some quiet outrageous predictions and I'm shocked us being 8-9 is the most disliked. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We only have to win 9 games to have a winning record, we are 1/3rd of the way there through 4 games. 

We have games against eagles, vikings, giants, falcons x2, miami, pats, and WFT

We have the saints in NO which could be a tougher game than the first one.

Tougher games are Cards, Bills, Bucs x2

So out of 9 games that we should win we only have to win 6 of them to have a winning record. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

We only have to win 9 games to have a winning record, we are 1/3rd of the way there through 4 games. 

We have games against eagles, vikings, giants, falcons x2, miami, pats, and WFT

We have the saints in NO which could be a tougher game than the first one.

Tougher games are Cards, Bills, Bucs x2

So out of 9 games that we should win we only have to win 6 of them to have a winning record. 

 

So you think the Eagles and Pats are pushovers? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You don’t even need 1b because Tepper is the only one foolish enough to wheel that deal.    Player wise? Jake’s elbow. JR and Pep getting sideways, no Carruth, Cam’s shoulder, Luke’s concussions, it would be a long list of stuff. You can take it down to certain plays in games. Fox chasing 2 point conversions in the SB would be on my list. RMJr slipping at the end of that same game was not helpful. 
    • Ultimately this just amounts to heavy revisionist history. I mean you aren't talking to someone that just popped out the womb a week ago. I was here all throughout the predraft process. The overwhelming majority of the fanbase felt like this was a fine situation and the best situation for a rookie QB to go to compared to Houston for example. The hype for Young and our "rockstar" staff was off the charts. No one could dare speak cautious skepticism of his abilities or they would be neg repped into oblivion. Only after he had one of statistical worst rookie seasons of the last 25 years did we get this narrative now that his rookie season actually shouldn't count. Complete malarkey if you ask me.
    • On the field? Since I guess it qualifies as multiple instances it might not count, but have the damn refs throw some flags on illegal hits to Cam's head in SB50. If that doesn't count, 1A. Cotchery caught it 1B. Kasey keeps that kickoff inbounds. Off the field? 1A. Team is sold to anyone but Tepper 1B. We have the patience not to mortgage the franchise on that Bryce trade. Stroudwpuldve been the better pick but he's not worth it either.
×
×
  • Create New...