Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Stats Broken Down by Quarter


CarolinaLivin
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd say have Darnold sit out the third quarter but Walker would probably be even worse than that 😕

Man, but think about what his average stats were per Quarter in a Jets uniform. Irrelevant so to say, but man our coaching staff has done an amazing job with this kid considering he has just about the same OL production from the jets  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Man, but think about what his average stats were per Quarter in a Jets uniform. Irrelevant so to say, but man our coaching staff has done an amazing job with this kid considering he has just about the same OL production from the jets  

I know some people hate hearing the "treat him like a rookie" line, but that approach actually seems to be working.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I know some people hate hearing the "treat him like a rookie" line, but that approach actually seems to be working.

I think that whole thing ended about when CMC went out. 

They have to slowly let him open up more & more. Cause teams are starting to notice that we are throwing a DJ Moore comeback route at least 5 times a game and 3 of them will be on 3rd downs. Granted that will change some when CMC comes back. They just didn't seemed "fooled" anymore in the third QTR, and they were playing "control the lead" (couldn't think of the word/phrase i wanted here) football in the 4th when we were making a lil comeback

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s a pretty weird stat/coincidence.

What are other possible reasons? Getting out coached after adjustments? Late adjustments? Oline taking a longer break? How many sacks/pressure come in the third I wonder…

 

Edited by onmyown
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, onmyown said:

That’s a pretty weird stat/coincidence.

What are the possible reasons? Get out coaches after adjustments? Late adjustments? Oline taking a longer break? How many sacks/pressure come in the third I wonder…

 

It appears the entire team shits the bed in the 3rd quarter.  They managed to weather the storm in the first 3 games, until they met Dallas.  Something is amiss in the locker room at halftime. 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It appears the entire team shits the bed in the 3rd quarter.  They managed to weather the storm in the first 3 games, until they met Dallas.  Something is amiss in the locker room at halftime. 

We seem to just "stick with whats working" until it doesn't, then take a few series after opponents half time adjustments to make our own...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

We seem to just "stick with whats working" until it doesn't, then take a few series after opponents half time adjustments to make our own...

That was one thing I was hoping would get left behind when we parted ways with Fox and Rivera but it looks like it's still here.

The smarter coaches play it like chess players. They try to anticipate adjustments the other team is going to make and act accordingly.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biggest thing I have seen from Darnold is his lack of pocket awareness - his is very poor at stepping up and feeling the rush around him.  he has been extremely lucky not to have more fumbles lost.  Our line has been just OK in pass protection at times but Sam can do more to help it.

But I agree we seem to get outcoached at the half and struggle to adjust.  

In fairness this past week one of those picks was Diggs making a great route jump and Darnold thought he could get it there faster - mistake but not one other guys wouldn't make.  The first pick was a bad but could be learned from

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stingray3030 said:

Biggest thing I have seen from Darnold is his lack of pocket awareness - his is very poor at stepping up and feeling the rush around him.  he has been extremely lucky not to have more fumbles lost.  Our line has been just OK in pass protection at times but Sam can do more to help it.

But I agree we seem to get outcoached at the half and struggle to adjust.  

In fairness this past week one of those picks was Diggs making a great route jump and Darnold thought he could get it there faster - mistake but not one other guys wouldn't make.  The first pick was a bad but could be learned from

How exactly do you step up when the guys in front of you are getting pushed back into your face?

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I know some people hate hearing the "treat him like a rookie" line, but that approach actually seems to be working.

From a development standpoint I would agree. 

Problem though, is with a rookie you have 3-4 years to decide if they are worth a big contract, with Sam you better have a pretty good idea after this season.

What we gave up for Sam isn't that big of a deal, what we will have to give up to keep him will be a lot more.

Honestly at this point I don't know if anyone knows for sure.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sam does have his issues in the third, buy it's a whole team effort... or lack thereof in the third. They come out in the 2nd half flat on both sides of the ball. 

I don't know what they do in  that locker room during the half, but it isn't filling them with a sense of urgency.

It's almost like they take a nap during halftime and use the 3rd to wake up. 

All other quarters they are damn solid. It's just coming out of that half that they sleep walk. 

Overcoming that is going ng to be the thing that makes them a championship team, even with a bad OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Stingray3030 said:

Biggest thing I have seen from Darnold is his lack of pocket awareness - his is very poor at stepping up and feeling the rush around him.  he has been extremely lucky not to have more fumbles lost.  Our line has been just OK in pass protection at times but Sam can do more to help it.

But I agree we seem to get outcoached at the half and struggle to adjust.  

In fairness this past week one of those picks was Diggs making a great route jump and Darnold thought he could get it there faster - mistake but not one other guys wouldn't make.  The first pick was a bad but could be learned from

Our OLine has been "ok"?  On which planet?  Our OLine has been all kinds of awful in the run and pass game.  It's little short of a miracle that Sam is playing as well as he is.

Those third quarter stats are frankly eye popping.  Especially because in the other three quarters Sam Darnolds stats look like a bona fide franchise QB.  73.5% completion, 1000 yards, 5 TD, 0 INT.  Yes please.

If we can get him playing four quarters at that clip, we have a SB in our future.  Real talk.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...