Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This is a playoff team


Adb6368
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, SBBlue said:

 


The Eagles have a top 10 defense in terms of yards, and top 3 in terms of passing yards. 

We were down our LG and LT, so  we moved our RT to LT and had a 3rd round rookie have his first NFL start at RT.  We were out our starting safety and linebacker, oh, and did I mention that our biggest offensive weapon, that about 60% of our offense runs through, was out?  And still we would have won if we had just played a little better.

Lets see who is healthy this Sunday.

Shoulda woulda coulda. They were a 1 win team motivated to win while we folded even when they tried to give us the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, I can't read your posts, frank but I see a little line where you post and they're always right after mine.  Makes me feel good, that I'm under your skin and you're just following me around like a little puppy barking and whining, and I don't have to read your crap.  Because you're on ignore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SBBlue said:

 


The Eagles have a top 10 defense in terms of yards, and top 3 in terms of passing yards. 

We were down our LG and LT, so  we moved our RT to LT and had a 3rd round rookie have his first NFL start at RT.  We were out our starting safety and linebacker, oh, and did I mention that our biggest offensive weapon, that about 60% of our offense runs through, was out?  And still we would have won if we had just played a little better.

Lets see who is healthy this Sunday.

the eagles gave up over 80 points the previous 2 weeks and were missing just as much starters as were were.

 

Nobody in the nfl is heathy 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

You know, I can't read your posts, frank but I see a little line where you post and they're always right after mine.  Makes me feel good, that I'm under your skin and you're just following me around like a little puppy barking and whining, and I don't have to read your crap.  Because you're on ignore.

That's cute. We both know you read them if you can find the opportunity to habitually poop on them like your pal hubby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

the eagles gave up over 80 points the previous 2 weeks and were missing just as much starters as were were.

 

Nobody in the nfl is heathy 

Their offense is 3rd in the league in turnovers dude.  Pts<>Yards due to short fields.  Yards is a better measure.  

Which player that 60% of their offense go through was out?

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Their offense is 3rd in the league in turnovers dude.  Pts<>Yards due to short fields.  Yards is a better measure.  

Which player that 60% of their offense go through was out?

Yards are better measure than points? In what universe????

 

The eagles are a mediocre team by all accounts and we just lost to them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

So the Ravens with Lamar Jackson are in QB limbo?

So the Cowboys with Dak are in QB limbo?

I mean...if we're measuring the ability to win the SB, those two(at least) are lacking that mainly 'cause they haven't even been able to get there.  

 

The requirement for QB limbo is having a QB who has had plenty of time in the league to show off a high level of talent, but instead has showed they are inconsistent (a game manager), or are lower tier (bottom of the NFL in stats).

Having a QB who is great doesn't automatically mean a SB win is only a matter of time. Only some great QBs win SBs, but only teams with great QBs win SBs in this era, with maybe an extremely rare exception. Just look at the last 20 or so SB winning teams. See the QBs?

We're in limbo with Sam. There is no getting out of limbo so long as Sam is the QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Thats why you look at both. PPG can be good, but teams can also get points off of 20 yard drives. Yards can be good, but teams can give up a ton of yard in garbage time. 

 

So you're saying the Eagles gave up a ton yards in garbage time...when they lost?  Huh?  Forget it. You're not going to explain that one away.  Your example contradicts your claim and doesn't make any sense.

Quote

All stats need context. 

I gave the context for the points and yards discrepancy by citing turnovers.  You gave no context for anything you cited, you just cited 80 points without noting those points were to the Chiefs and Cowboys.  The Eagles limited the 9ers to 17 and Falcons to 6, and of course the Panthers to 18.   

You just don't want to look at context.  You want to look at stats that support your worldview.  
 

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

So you're saying the Eagles gave up a ton yards in garbage time...when they lost?  Huh?  Forget it. You're not going to explain that one away.  Your example contradicts your claim and doesn't make any sense.

I gave the context for the points and yards discrepancy by citing turnovers.  You gave no context for anything you cited, you just cited 80 points without noting those points were to the Chiefs and Cowboys.  The Eagles limited the 9ers to 17 and Falcons to 6, and of course the Panthers to 18.   

You just don't want to look at context.  You want to look at stats that support your worldview.  
 

I'm not saying for one single game bro, I'm saying overall. You cant just look at one stat, I did not even read your other post before that one but I can go back and read it if you like. I was not calling you out or anything. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...