Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cowboys Waive offensive tackle Brandon Knight.

ichigo1057

By ichigo1057,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ichigo1057 Experienced

ichigo1057

Posted
Posted

LT Brandon Knight was waived by the Cowboys. I know people are probably thinking "Who?" but given the crap we have on our line do you guys think it might be worth it to put in a claim on him and see what he can do for us? I don't know much about him though some of the Dallas articles I've read stated he has Guard/Tackle flexibility. He is likely to go back onto the Dallas practice squad if nobody puts in a claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBBlue Veteran

SBBlue

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, @bonafidebanter said:

Do not touch this guy. He's just as bad as Cam Erving. If not worse. No disrespect to Mr. Erving at all. 

The question is, is he better than Daley at RG or Christiansen at LT? Cam and Elflein may see more time out, and if he can play on par, we could use him. 

 I do not want to repeat last weeks experiment.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, SBBlue said:

The question is, is he better than Daley at RG or Christiansen at LT? Cam and Elflein may see more time out, and if he can play on par, we could use him. 

 I do not want to repeat last weeks experiment.  

This. Erving had probably been our second beat OL prior to getting hurt. All he needs to be is better than our worst.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ichigo1057 Experienced

ichigo1057

Posted
  • Author
Posted
12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sure. Why not?

We're at the point we have to take scraps, might as well be scraps off of one of if not the best OLs in the NFL.

That was what I was thinking as well. I'm not sure where we are in the waiver order but I'd definitely try for him given our problems. Most articles I see about him talk him up though some of them do mention he has issues with Speed Rushers when playing LT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
Just now, ichigo1057 said:

That was what I was thinking as well. I'm not sure where we are in the waiver order but I'd definitely try for him given our problems. Most articles I see about him talk him up though some of them do mention he has issues with Speed Rushers when playing LT.

Our biggest issues are along the IOL, so that's fine by me. Christensen was good enough last week that I think he should continue starting and developing at OT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

If you fling poo at the wall to see what sticks, you're still going to be stuck with poo.

Sorry, just not interested. With this league being as OL needy as it is, unemployed OL are unemployed for a reason. They suck. We have enough of that here. Don't want more.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlackPanther21_ Grand Master

BlackPanther21_

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, rayzor said:

If you fling poo at the wall to see what sticks, you're still going to be stuck with poo.

Sorry, just not interested. With this league being as OL needy as it is, unemployed OL are unemployed for a reason. They suck. We have enough of that here. Don't want more.

He could just be buried on the depth chart in Dallas with that excellent line they have.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Bryce’s new look. He looks like a grown up

      By frankw · Posted

      Oh please with the wallowing in victimhood I'm going to take my ball and go home routine. You were just in here referring to people as super weird haters because they don't completely agree with your borderline delusional spin on what Bryce Young is and isn't as a fourth year starter. We can hope by some miracle that Bryce Young will actually be able to lead a formidable passing offense this season without being irrational homers and pretending verfiable data and what we have seen with our own two eyes doesn't tell us exactly what he has been to this point which is someone who moves the ball at a historically low rate.
    • OldhamA
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By OldhamA · Posted

      I am curious who's behind all of this though. A video and photos from years ago surfacing? Someone has a vendetta and is driving this PR campaign. I'm loving it, but I'd also like to know who said mystery figure is. 
    • strato
      Bryce’s new look. He looks like a grown up

      By strato · Posted

      I say positive things about Bryce when he earns them. Which he has a handful of times. It is all here and on the record but your lobby won’t focus on that or the flat out truth inside of our critical comments.  It is a constant thing with him and his backers - one or two good things and people are trying to extrapolate that to proof we should commit to him, while ignoring or making excuses for the larger portion of his track record.  When he is able to consistently turn in franchise QB extension worthy outings the tone of the posts will reflect that.  I have already said that if he would play like he did in the WC as often as we need him to, I would be okay with keeping him.  See you don’t want to talk about that though because it shows actual fair minded evaluation not stanning.   
×
×
  • Create New...