Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Team designed around CMC. Can’t wi. Without him

raleigh-panther

By raleigh-panther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TDGone Collaborator

TDGone

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Right it has been said but not even a remote shred of evidence that this offense is designed or built for any damn thing never mind a specific person.

1...literally one shred of evidence from OP or his friend or whoever else....simply overworking CMC isn't an offensive design or a build.

The want CMC to bail their behind out knowing they did nothing is what I see from the outside looking in.If CMC did comeback we might as well put the wildcat in to give him that extra blocker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TDGone Collaborator

TDGone

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

He averaged 4 yards a carry today with no signs of slowing down. Insert whatever RB name you want but the running game was working better than the passing game so why abandon the run? Even the Vikings youtubers were saying run on them to beat them on PNP

Well to be fair it was 3.8 yards but he faced a lot 7 man box today.If he starting ripping off big gains he will start to see 8 man box like CMC does then we could gauge his value better.With Hubbard as the feature back teams will let him have his 4 yards to keep us from hitting the big play to DJ or Robbie but teams always have a spy on CMC which helps our wr. Running the ball is not Hubbard weakness right now it’s his blitz pick up and pass catching ability that he needs a lot of work.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthero Mentor

Panthero

Posted
Posted

Chuba is a great running back, but my thinking was we needed a guy like cmc as his backup. Seems like the offense has to shift gears considerably with a different type of runningback, since that player gets so many touches. 

P.S. of course finding a guy like cmc is easier said than done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TDGone Collaborator

TDGone

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Panthero said:

Chuba is a great running back, but my thinking was we needed a guy like cmc as his backup. Seems like the offense has to shift gears considerably with a different type of runningback, since that player gets so many touches. 

P.S. of course finding a guy like cmc is easier said than done.

First Chuba is great RB based on what ? He avg 4 yard against 3 bad run defenses . He gives you nothing as a blocker or in The passing game.So you think they are trading CMC? So you want the Panthers to find a elite RB to back up a avg RB? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TDGone Collaborator

TDGone

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, TDGone said:

First Chuba is great RB based on what ? He avg 4 yard against 3 bad run defenses . He gives you nothing as a blocker or in The passing game.So you think they are trading CMC? So you want the Panthers to find a elite RB to back up a avg RB? 

If we want to trade CMC , I would start with the Ravens , Bills or Dolphins teams that need RB help. But I don’t know about his contract if we traded him.

Edited by TDGone
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthero Mentor

Panthero

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, TDGone said:

First Chuba is great RB based on what ? He avg 4 yard against 3 bad run defenses . He gives you nothing as a blocker or in The passing game.So you think they are trading CMC? So you want the Panthers to find a elite RB to back up a avg RB? 

Happy Little Girl GIF by Demic

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted

I cannot repeat enough how utterly regressive an offensive “philosophy” designed around a FUGGING RUNNING BACK is (no matter how good a receiver) in the NFL of the 2020’s.

 “You know all those rules you’ve passed to make it easier on QBs and OTs and harder on pass defenders and pass rushers? Well fug those rules, Ima party like it’s 1986!”

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
Just now, Jon Snow said:

Smokescreen. 

The real plan is to unleash Darnold the Destroyer out of the read option.   Dude's gonna get a buck treefitty rushing on the Giants. Probably get something like 10 touchdowns or something. 

Sign Cam and move Darnold the destroyer to RB and watch as he breaks all the RB records.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Jackson113.2
      Unc Basketball thread

      By Jackson113.2 · Posted

    • strato
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By strato · Posted

      Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...