Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Team designed around CMC. Can’t wi. Without him

raleigh-panther

By raleigh-panther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ClawOn Grand Master

ClawOn

Posted
Posted

Yes this is true. It was a gamble. We would likely be 5-1 with CMC. Other than being elite, he masks the O line weaknesses,  forces defenses to limit blitzes. 

He got hurt. Maybe he'll never play a full season again. Lost the bet. New plan next season. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted

For real someone explain the part where this offense is designed around anything or anyone...

Which picks, which moves, what? This offense is willy nilly no matter who is in. CMCs plays have been similar to Cams it's not designed or built around its "save me jeebus" and that's it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TDGone Collaborator

TDGone

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Well I’m sure this post will not go over well

but as a friend of mine said, the   offense is designed around CMC and without him, they can’t win

Sadly, he is right 

they won’t win until he returns 

They lean on CMC not designed , if so this is a poo design 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TDGone Collaborator

TDGone

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

They basically had a whole season without him and still don't know what to do. Hubbard is basically at the same yards per rush attempt as CMC yet we only ran 16 times today? Pretty sure 10 more rushes would have equaled at least 1 or 2 more field goals at minimum. Def on that horrible drive at the end of the 2nd I believe it was. It all kinda blurred together today

Running against the Vikes is not the same as running on the Saints. Let’s see what Hubbard does if goes up against the Bucs D.We want to get away from giving the same back 25 rushes or 30 touches a game so why should we do that with Hubbard

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TDGone Collaborator

TDGone

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

No one has laid out any designs or builds....it doesn't exist.

 

Agree with you 100 percent. They new what they had in CMC in 2017 yet no investment in top o line or QB. They wanted CMC to sell tickets because Rhule is Defense minded coach and wanted to start that rebuild first. That’s why I was hoping we would have landed a more offense minded coach .

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
Just now, TDGone said:

Agree with you 100 percent. They new what they had in CMC in 2017 yet no investment in top o line or QB. They wanted CMC to sell tickets because Rhule is Defense minded coach and wanted to start that rebuild first. That’s why I was hoping we would have landed a more offense minded coach .

Right it has been said but not even a remote shred of evidence that this offense is designed or built for any damn thing never mind a specific person.

1...literally one shred of evidence from OP or his friend or whoever else....simply overworking CMC isn't an offensive design or a build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, TDGone said:

Running against the Vikes is not the same as running on the Saints. Let’s see what Hubbard does if goes up against the Bucs D.We want to get away from giving the same back 25 rushes or 30 touches a game so why should we do that with Hubbard

He averaged 4 yards a carry today with no signs of slowing down. Insert whatever RB name you want but the running game was working better than the passing game so why abandon the run? Even the Vikings youtubers were saying run on them to beat them on PNP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      College Basketball 2025

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Truth. Like when UNC hired Butch Davis and then we get hit for recruiting violations. Like yeah, no poo. Dude coached Miami when they we paying like the 33rd NFL team. What did you expect?
    • Basbear
      Processing Blue: immediate draft needs

      By Basbear · Posted

      He's a hard player to rank, cause he is a young NT. I do see his abilities to branch out among the DL. That's the only way for him to land in the 1st, some team has to believe he's got the stuff to play DE or T3.... I just don't see using 19 on him, I feel there should be around 7 players just ranked higher than him for the Panthers team.  ___________________________________________________________________   Now you are a roster nut like me. Im tossing this into fire, I think a good move is to trade UP, yes rare. Just the roster #s tell me 5 rookies and no more than 2 starters will make the team. I feel 5 is magic number.    QB- 2  BY, Pickett RB- 3   Chubba, Brooks(pls), etienne TE- 4   Sanders, Temble, Evans, Draft pick/major/franks/UDFA OL- 10   Walker, Lewis, Fortner, Hunt, Motown, Zavailla, Samac, Stone, Draft pick, Draft pick/Charles/carter WR-  6   Tmac, XL, Coker, Metch, Horn, Tremay   offense=  25 with 3 draft picks   DL-  6   Brown, Brown, Wharton, Ray, Cam, Hunter/draft pick Ed-   5  Phillips, Nic, Prince, Jones, ST/incoom/hampton ILB-   5  Lloyd, Wallace, Bam, Claud, draft pick CB-    5 Horn, Jackson, Thor, Evans, draft pick/CSN/UDFA SS-  4  Scott, More, Ramsom, Sim   Defense = 25 with 2 picks   ST = known 3+o+d = 53 roster   SO I see only room for 5-6 with factoring in UDFA pool. That tells me to trade up! Bonus the 1st+3rd gets in front of TB yucs. Then use one of the 5ths+2nd to draft another target. That's your two starters and use the 4th, 5th and 6th for the development OTs and what ever the best player are at the pick/DB. The last couple years they have added 2-3 UDFA each year, maybe the same this year too. Soooooooo Im normally 95% trade back, but above made me change my mind. I do not want to waive 5th rounder, I feel thats high with players on the bench.    ?? There's waiver claims too, they have done that each year.     
    • uncfan888
      2026 Charlotte Hornets

      By uncfan888 · Posted

      Big game tonight. Please send the annoying ass bandwagon New York fans home sad
×
×
  • Create New...