Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Texans have had serious trade talks regarding Deshaun Watson with Dolphins, Eagles, and Panthers


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

 

I think we could all agree the Watson thing from the league punishment perspective has been bizarre as ***. Like he's not suspended or commissioners list or nothing.

So is the evidence lacking or what b/c if there was proof of the more egregious poo how could there possibly be nothing done...

Most of what Ive read says he goes on the exempt list as soon as he's traded.  He isn't yet but supposedly will be l.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

 

I think we could all agree the Watson thing from the league punishment perspective has been bizarre as ***. Like he's not suspended or commissioners list or nothing.

So is the evidence lacking or what b/c if there was proof of the more egregious poo how could there possibly be nothing done...

You trade for Watson and you start him. You force the NFL to do something, and see if they back down. If the NFL makes him exempt, then you get the NFLPA involved. If he stays exempt, then you plan for next season with a franchise QB. If the NFL backs down, then you plan for a possible SB run.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Most of what Ive read says he goes on the exempt list as soon as he's traded.  He isn't yet but supposedly will be l.

Yea but what does that have to do with anything. If someone is punishment worthy then you punish them yea? What other situation has been like this.

Neither is anywhere near good but the women I know would rather get bopped in the face a good one than....well yall know so....like if you piece up a women its quick and easy punishment but if you....then it's self benching?

My maff ain't adding up here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, pantherj said:

You trade for Watson and you start him. You force the NFL to do something, and see if they back down. If the NFL makes him exempt, then you get the NFLPA involved. If he stays exempt, then you plan for next season with a franchise QB. If the NFL backs down, then you plan for a possible SB run.

Gimme that all day.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand how everyone keeps saying "Miami has the picks to pull this off" - they dont... The Eagles do, but not the dolphins. The Dolphins dont even have their own first round pick this year, they have the 49ers pick. They will have to trade this year's draft picks and next years draft picks to pull this off. The Texans are not going to want Tua back in exchange either. 

image.thumb.png.7541a393bc65a19677a7d983ce476aa8.png

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Yea but what does that have to do with anything. If someone is punishment worthy then you punish them yea? What other situation has been like this.

Neither is anywhere near good but the women I know would rather get bopped in the face a good one than....well yall know so....like if you piece up a women its quick and easy punishment but if you....then it's self benching?

My maff ain't adding up here.

It's a weird situation for sure. I don't have an answer either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, pantherj said:

You trade for Watson and you start him. You force the NFL to do something, and see if they back down. If the NFL makes him exempt, then you get the NFLPA involved. If he stays exempt, then you plan for next season with a franchise QB. If the NFL backs down, then you plan for a possible SB run.

Yup, and that seems so much like a Tepper move.  And honestly, judging from his reaction during the game on Sunday, I wouldn't be surprised at all of he is pushing for this to get done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

100% facts.  Watson been playing behind a poo line (outside of Tunsil) for years and still makes it happen.

Imagine Watson and CMC comes back. You kidding me? And that young defense figures things out? Yeah I like our chances of unseating the Bucs. Watson doesn't need great protection, and the o-line looks worse than it is with Sam holding the ball and missing passes getting us into third and long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the problem is if we're waiting for Cam v2, we're going to be waiting decades longer.  our best hope is that bryce is better than we all think he is and that canales is able to work some serious magic with him and the scheme to help him live up anywhere close to the potential we thought he had. he's a smart kid. we just have to be able to have a situation that allows him to use his smarts.  the truth with cam was that een he had to have a system tailored for his skillset coming into the league. the difference between him and luck (which was the debate in '09 when we thought luck was an option) was that with luck, he could be placed in any offense and it would work...hence the higher floor he had  than cam. cam, though, needed an offense that was built around him to reach his potential. he could have done alright in a more pro-style offense, but to reach his ceiling (which was seen by a lot of people as being higher than luck). i don't think having to have an offense tailored around what you can and can't do well is a problem for people who can develop around them...after they've truly identified what those can and can't items are. we didn't have that last year. i think we have that this year. we want a guy who can carry a team on his back, but those kind of guys are very rare. we don't need to spend our time trying  find that guy, because even when you have them there's no guarantee that they will be enough.  championships are won, quite often, by teams who learn to compensate for less than the greatest QB play. you have a great defense and can protect the ball while wearing out the other defense and you've got a chance.  we don't need Bryce to be superman (despite where we drafted him and what we paid to get him). we just need him to be able to run (manage) a good offense. 
    • The Panthers aren't building a Bryce Young roster. Alabama didn't recruit personnel to fit a Bryce Young scheme. Canales' approach is to build an NFL roster (which they didn't have last season) and then cater his scheme and playcalling to what the players do best. The team is not pigeon holing itself into an offense that doesn't fit any other QB. Their goal this off-season was to provide NFL average or better talent to the offense - period. Very little to do with matching personnel for  Bryce Young's skillset or lack thereof.
    • lol the time lapse version of Panthers breakdowns
×
×
  • Create New...