Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DVOA 2020 vs. 2021 Offense/Defense/Special Teams


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

Offense

DVOA 2020: -0.2% (17th in the NFL)

DVOA 2021: -15.9% (25th in the NFL)

Passing DVOA 2020: 12.3% (20th in the NFL)

Passing DVOA 2021: -11.6 (29th in the NFL)

Rushing DVOA 2020: -8.8% (16th in the NFL)

Rushing DVOA 2021: -9.0% (16th in the NFL)

 

Defense

DVOA 2020: 7.3% (24th in the NFL)

DVOA 2021: -6.4% (8th in the NFL)

Passing DVOA 2020: 15.5% (23rd in the NFL)

Passing DVOA 2021: -3.0% (7th in the NFL)

Rushing DVOA 2020: -4.5% (20th in the NFL)

Rushing DVOA 2021: -11.1% (18th in the NFL)

 

Special Teams

DVOA 2020: 0.8 (16th in the NFL)

DVOA 2021: -3.1% (26th in the NFL)

 

Interesting to see that our offense and special teams have gotten so much worse in 2021, especially the passing offense. Conversely, the pass defense improvement has been remarkable. We do still struggle defending the run, however. Modest improvements so far in that area.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

2 things that haven't been a priority. Getting a solid kicker after Butker got poached, and building an offensive line with FA that don't spend the majority of their time on a bike. No wonder we went down in those 2 areas.

Given the fact that our rushing offense is basically the same as last year(middle of the league), I definitely see why they want to put emphasis on that moving forward. If you look at the 2020 vs. 2021 OL stats on FO, the drop off is pretty bad across the board. 

The passing offense though......woof. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In defense of our rushing defense, 42% of our total rushing yardage allowed has been to Elliott and Cook. Those are two of the top 5 rushers(in yds/GM) in the NFL currently.

Taking a closer look at the rush defense specifically:

Game 1(NY Jets)

Jets OL(26th rated DVOA), Rushing Offense(31st in the NFL, 74.0 yds/GM)

Allowed: 45 rushing yards(29 yards under avg)

Game 2(New Orleans)

Saints OL(5th rated DVOA), Rushing Offense(9th in the NFL, 125.8 yds/GM)

Allowed: 48 rushing yards(77.8 yards under avg)

Game 3(Houston Texans)

Texans OL(32nd rated DVOA), Rushing Offense(26th in the NFL, 89.8 yds/GM)

Allowed: 42 rushing yards(47.8 yards under avg)

Game 4(Dallas Cowboys)

Cowboys OL(1st rated DVOA), Rushing Offense(2nd in the NFL, 164.3 yds/GM)

Allowed: 245 rushing yards(80.7 yds OVER avg)

Game 5(Philadelphia Eagles)

Eagles OL(21st rated DVOA), Rushing Offense(15th in the NFL, 113.7 yds/GM)

Allowed: 91 rushing yards(22.7 under avg)

Game 6(Minnesota Vikings)

Vikings OL(25th rated DVOA), Rushing Offense(8th in the NFL, 127.8 yds/GM)

Allowed: 198 rushing yards(70.2 yds OVER avg)

 

So we have pretty much won 4 out of 6 matchups on the DL. It's just the shelling we have taken in those two big losses skewed our stats quite a bit.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

In defense of our rushing defense, 42% of our total rushing yardage allowed has been to Elliott and Cook. Those are two of the top 5 rushers(in yds/GM) in the NFL currently.

Taking a closer look at the rush defense specifically:

Game 1(NY Jets)

Jets OL(26th rated DVOA), Rushing Offense(31st in the NFL, 74.0 yds/GM)

Allowed: 45 rushing yards(29 yards under avg)

Game 2(New Orleans)

Saints OL(5th rated DVOA), Rushing Offense(9th in the NFL, 125.8 yds/GM)

Allowed: 48 rushing yards(77.8 yards under avg)

Game 3(Houston Texans)

Texans OL(32nd rated DVOA), Rushing Offense(26th in the NFL, 89.8 yds/GM)

Allowed: 42 rushing yards(47.8 yards under avg)

Game 4(Dallas Cowboys)

Cowboys OL(1st rated DVOA), Rushing Offense(2nd in the NFL, 164.3 yds/GM)

Allowed: 245 rushing yards(80.7 yds OVER avg)

Game 5(Philadelphia Eagles)

Eagles OL(21st rated DVOA), Rushing Offense(15th in the NFL, 113.7 yds/GM)

Allowed: 91 rushing yards(22.7 under avg)

Game 6(Minnesota Vikings)

Vikings OL(25th rated DVOA), Rushing Offense(8th in the NFL, 127.8 yds/GM)

Allowed: 198 rushing yards(70.2 yds OVER avg)

 

So we have pretty much won 4 out of 6 matchups on the DL. It's just the shelling we have taken in those two big losses skewed our stats quite a bit.

Nice stats lately though.

Man be like let a ****** say Darnold is good. Never underestimate thems

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Passing numbers make complete sense though.  This line is currently competing with 2014 as one of our worst lines ever.

Actually, if you look at OL DVOA and Adjusted Sack Rate, there have been 3-4 years since 2010 that have been worse than this year.

That's actually the most upsetting part. Poor OL play isn't rare in Carolina

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Actually, if you look at OL DVOA and Adjusted Sack Rate, there have been 3-4 years since 2010 that have been worse than this year.

That's actually the most upsetting part. Poor OL play isn't rare in Carolina

I think it is a systemic problem and probably starts in our scouting/evaluation department. Wonder how much turnover we've had there or if it has remained stagnant for the last decade. We do seem to make the same O-line mistakes again and again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

I think it is a systemic problem and probably starts in our scouting/evaluation department. Wonder how much turnover we've had there or if it has remained stagnant for the last decade. We do seem to make the same O-line mistakes again and again.

Actually, I think it really begins and ends in our front office. We don't really spend significant draft capital trying to build there historically. There is only so much dumpster diving you can do and be successful.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Offense

DVOA 2020: -0.2% (17th in the NFL)

DVOA 2021: -15.9% (25th in the NFL)

Passing DVOA 2020: 12.3% (20th in the NFL)

Passing DVOA 2021: -11.6 (29th in the NFL)

Rushing DVOA 2020: -8.8% (16th in the NFL)

Rushing DVOA 2021: -9.0% (16th in the NFL)

 

Defense

DVOA 2020: 7.3% (24th in the NFL)

DVOA 2021: -6.4% (8th in the NFL)

Passing DVOA 2020: 15.5% (23rd in the NFL)

Passing DVOA 2021: -3.0% (7th in the NFL)

Rushing DVOA 2020: -4.5% (20th in the NFL)

Rushing DVOA 2021: -11.1% (18th in the NFL)

 

Special Teams

DVOA 2020: 0.8 (16th in the NFL)

DVOA 2021: -3.1% (26th in the NFL)

 

Interesting to see that our offense and special teams have gotten so much worse in 2021, especially the passing offense. Conversely, the pass defense improvement has been remarkable. We do still struggle defending the run, however. Modest improvements so far in that area.

This keeps up I hope ST Coach BLACKBURN is gone and OC Joe BRADY!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Actually, I think it really begins and ends in our front office. We don't really spend significant draft capital trying to build there historically. There is only so much dumpster diving you can do and be successful.

And I think the new boss there may be the same as the old boss there. I've said it before, Fitterer looks busy but his hit rate is pretty low at this point and really bad when it comes to offensive linemen.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, we built on that momentum alright. LOL Trying to prop up a QB with a game plan instead of trying to do your best to win a game with the tools you have at your disposal is what you do with a rookie early on in his career on a bad team. It's not what you do with a 3rd year #1 overall pick when you're shockingly sitting at 6-5 and playing for the division lead.
    • Canales outsmarts himself on a very consisent basis. In some ways, he is one of the most ill suited to be head coach of the Tepper tenure.
    • i find this to be alarming on so many levels  im going to change the order of the portions i copied from Joe’s article i  really have serious doubts   about Canales’ common sense  1. A running team forgetting to run  2. Making this game plan about Young’s passing game momentum .  Total idiot.  It is about winning games not about young’s momentum. That is what practice is for , not live games  god help us all.    Article below  Confused by the Panthers’ pass-heavy play calls vs. 49ers? Rico Dowdle probably was, too   CHARLOTTE, N.C. — In two seasons here, Canales has juggled offensive play calling with his head coach responsibilities. Sometimes the balls end up on the floor. In two critical moments Monday night, Canales chose to go with a pass in situations where a handoff would have been the more direct approach. The first was the disastrous, first-and-goal play from the 1 where Bryce Young opted against running in for the score and instead lobbed the ball toward rookie Mitchell Evans, only to see safety Ji’Ayir Brown come down with it. The second one was just as perplexing. When the 49ers were whistled for roughing long snapper J.J. Jansen on Ryan Fitzgerald’s successful PAT pulled the Panthers to 17-10, Canales took the point off the board and went for a 2-pointer from the 1. But Canales ran a play that didn’t take advantage of the spot, with Young missing Jalen Coker in the back of the end zone. (Rookie wideout Jimmy Horn Jr. appeared to be the first read in the flat.) Canales said after the game he wanted to build on Young’s record-breaking passing performance in Atlanta, and thought the line was protecting well. But that lack of rhythm Canales mentioned was the result of never giving Dowdle the opportunity to get into it. When Dowdle ripped off a 17-yard gain on the first offensive play of the second half, Canales came back to him two plays later. It was his final carry.   After an overnight, cross-country flight, Rico Dowdle began his Tuesday — at least on social media — with an emoji. Dowdle’s post on Xcontained no words accompanying the face with spiral eyes emoji, which EmojiTerra tells us symbolizes “confusion, dizziness, overwhelm or being utterly shocked.” Per the website, it’s often used to convey “feeling dazed, hypnotized, or caught off-guard in troubling or surprising situations.” It’s not hard to figure out why the Carolina Panthers running back would be feeling some or all of those emotions. Dowdle has been one of the Panthers’ fun, feel-good stories this season, an Asheville native who signed a prove-it deal with his home-state team and then got right to the business of proving it. Before the Panthers hosted the Dallas Cowboys in Week 6, Dowdle warned his former team to “buckle up,” then backed up his words by running for 183 yards and racking up 239 yards from scrimmage. But in a 20-9 loss to the San Francisco 49ers on Monday night, it was Dowdle who was buckled up. And the guy who strapped Dowdle into a safety harness and threw on the child-safety locks was none other than Panthers coach Dave Canales. Dowdle led all backs Monday — including Christian McCaffrey — by averaging 6.3 yards per carry. But while 49ers coach Kyle Shanahan was feeding McCaffrey a cornucopia of 24 carries and 31 touches, Dowdle finished with a meager six rushing attempts. That matched his season low from a loss at Arizona in Week 2, when Chuba Hubbard was still RB1 and the Panthers were throwing nearly every down in the second half trying to catch up. Dowdle wasn’t the only back Canales dissed. Hubbard had just three carries and the Panthers finished with 13 as a team, tied for the fifth fewest in franchise history. Some of it was about opportunity, or lack of it. With the 49ers’ two touchdown drives consuming more than 16 minutes, the Panthers ran just 43 offensive plays, which matched their low under Canales and tied for the second fewest in team history. But Canales, who arrived in Charlotte last year preaching the balanced offense gospel, conceded Tuesday that he didn’t emphasize the running plays on his call sheet nearly enough. “Offensively, just could not get our rhythm going. And really it just started off with the run game. I have to make sure that that comes alive,” he said during an opening statement to reporters. “That’s a part of who we are. It’s a part of what we believe in. We have two great backs that contribute to this team. The offensive line was blocking well and that was a missed opportunity by me. And I’ll do better in that regard.”        
×
×
  • Create New...