Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

They just don't get it....

Jmac

By Jmac,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Cdparr7 Grand Master

Cdparr7

Posted
Posted

Everyone who wants to trade for Watson either A) don’t realize how much 3 first round picks go or B) think we trade some scrubs and get him.

”yeah give them Sam Franklin and half a bag of donuts they’ll do it”

Trading 3 first round picks would be like trading Derrick Brown, Brian Burns, and Jaycee Horn for him.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Unless something drastically changes it is going to play out with 10 straight losses. The Giants were the worst team left on the schedule and we scored 3 points. 

So far a drastic change for this staff is switching which side of the field our WRs line up on. 

 

 

Ok, I'm not sure I know how to answer this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Everyone who wants to trade for Watson either A) don’t realize how much 3 first round picks go or B) think we trade some scrubs and get him.

”yeah give them Sam Franklin and half a bag of donuts they’ll do it”

Trading 3 first round picks would be like trading Derrick Brown, Brian Burns, and Jaycee Horn for him.

I say give them Robby, Paradis, Miller and a 7th. They can have the donuts too if you want. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Everyone who wants to trade for Watson either A) don’t realize how much 3 first round picks go or B) think we trade some scrubs and get him.

”yeah give them Sam Franklin and half a bag of donuts they’ll do it”

Trading 3 first round picks would be like trading Derrick Brown, Brian Burns, and Jaycee Horn for him.

 

Not to mention that salary. I truly believe the folks that are all over this have no regard for the cost involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Everyone who wants to trade for Watson either A) don’t realize how much 3 first round picks go or B) think we trade some scrubs and get him.

”yeah give them Sam Franklin and half a bag of donuts they’ll do it”

Trading 3 first round picks would be like trading Derrick Brown, Brian Burns, and Jaycee Horn for him.

Would you trade 3 1st round picks for a Pat Mahomes??

Let it be Brown Burns  and Horn would you do it??

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cdparr7 Grand Master

Cdparr7

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Would you trade 3 1st round picks for a Pat Mahomes??

Let it be Brown Burns  and Horn would you do it??

Nope. Sure wouldn’t. 
 

Don’t really care to be the 80s dolphins with Dan Marino carrying a worthless team. 
 

Deshaun Watson isn’t close to Mahomes.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Jmac said:

I don't care who the fug they sign as QB. This team is going NOWHERE with the Oline they put on the field season after season. This year, next year, or five years from now. 

Putting the horse before the cart for how many seasons now? They still can't understand that the front five on the Oline is what oils the engine. Don't know what the fug it will take to get that message across.

They persist in ignoring the most important cog on any offense besides the QB.

 

A good QB can mask the problems of the O-line. This belief that a QB can only be successful if the O-line is good is false. The reason Darnold sucks behind our line is because he isn't a good QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SazmoRanger Proficient

SazmoRanger

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Cdparr7 said:

Everyone who wants to trade for Watson either A) don’t realize how much 3 first round picks go or B) think we trade some scrubs and get him.

”yeah give them Sam Franklin and half a bag of donuts they’ll do it”

Trading 3 first round picks would be like trading Derrick Brown, Brian Burns, and Jaycee Horn for him.

All those players are great, but they sure as hell aren’t helping us win, so I don’t understand this argument. 
 

We’ve had 3 top 15 picks the last 3 years and yet we still sit at 3-4 with a 4 game losing streak. Hell, look back at the last 5 years… 

CMC, Moore, Burns, Brown, And Horn. 
 

They all seem to be great, but it doesn’t matter if you don’t have an elite QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...