Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

wATs0N pIcKEd MiaMi...WRONG


PanthersGOATFan336
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

nicksplat doug GIF

Deeeeerp. You don’t have to read between the lines when it comes to Miami, as you and others have had to desperately and idiotically do for Carolina. Idiots.

The Carolina Panthers had no further interest in trading for Deshaun Watson due to lack of clarity with his legal situation and Watson's plans with his no-trade clause, sources told ESPN's Jeremy Fowler.

Watson is facing 22 lawsuits alleging sexual assault and inappropriate behavior and has not played a down for the Texans this season. He has a no-trade clause in his contract, which he's willing to waive for the Dolphins.

The Panthers, who explored a potential Watson deal dating back to the offseason, got indications that Watson would be interested in playing for them but hadn't received that commitment in writing -- a customary step for a no-trade clause -- as of this week.

"[The Panthers] felt he would have come to Carolina, but [that] he wanted Miami first," a source told ESPN.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/32513207/deshaun-watson-legal-issues-no-trade-clause-uncertainty-caused-panthers-back-trade-pursuit-sources-say?platform=amp

Edited by onmyown
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, onmyown said:

Deeeeerp. You don’t have to read between the lines when it comes to Miami, as you and others have had to desperately and idiotically do for Carolina. Idiots.

The Carolina Panthers had no further interest in trading for Deshaun Watson due to lack of clarity with his legal situation and Watson's plans with his no-trade clause, sources told ESPN's Jeremy Fowler.

Watson is facing 22 lawsuits alleging sexual assault and inappropriate behavior and has not played a down for the Texans this season. He has a no-trade clause in his contract, which he's willing to waive for the Dolphins.

The Panthers, who explored a potential Watson deal dating back to the offseason, got indications that Watson would be interested in playing for them but hadn't received that commitment in writing -- a customary step for a no-trade clause -- as of this week.

"[The Panthers] felt he would have come to Carolina, but [that] he wanted Miami first," a source told ESPN.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/32513207/deshaun-watson-legal-issues-no-trade-clause-uncertainty-caused-panthers-back-trade-pursuit-sources-say?platform=amp

image.thumb.png.2c78c8e81a7c5fd65a447d40e7850a88.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The Dolphins are the only team that Watson is known to have waived his no-trade clause for, according to sources. Watson has not done the same for the Carolina Panthers or any other team, sources told ESPN.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/32515112/houston-texans-set-keep-deshaun-watson-nfl-trade-deadline-sources-say

It’s pretty damn clear we were prepared to give up whatever it takes and he repeatedly said nah. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would any team want this piece of trash?   All of these teams talk about only wanting high character players.   Garbage.   If Watson was a fringe player, he would never play in the NFL again.   But, these GM’s are willing to sell their souls for some wins.   And so are some of our fans.  What if it was one of your daughters being molested by Watson?

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AceBoogie said:

It’s pretty damn clear we were prepared to give up whatever it takes and he repeatedly said nah. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional. 

Eh...IDK about "clear." The one thing that seems to be clear is that the sources everyone has aren't saying the same things. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The division is most certainly wide open. The Bucs are a problem but Baker Mayfield is and will remain his own worst enemy it's a matter of when not if he has a bad game or even a stretch of bad games. As far as the Panthers they have done an admirable job of trying to address needs as best they can without pulling a Scott Fitterer and getting desperate which has only made us worse off in the past. On the Bryce subject all anyone can really say at this point is we just have to wait and see. This is the year and despite what the Panthers may say publicly doubling down and going all in on WR is as good as any sign anyone should need that they expect Bryce Young to have a very productive and convincing season. The pieces are in place. They aren't perfect but nothing ever will be. Regardless there's honestly no excuse for this staff and this team not to be able to compete in this iteration of the NFC South. Also just want to say this because I can say the hyper defensive posts already being made in here and it's probably going to be a season with highs and lows again but hopefully more highs for sure. But just because there is dialogue about a position group or a player that challenges your preconceived notions or makes you uncomfortable does not make it "hate" or "anti" this player or that player. For some people who talk a lot about nuance you would think this wouldn't need to be stated but that's where we're at. 
    • If I was a coach I would preach "Don't let the refs decide the game" because as soon as you let the NFL the chance to help their bottom dollar whether it be teams that make most money or gambling then they will screw the team that doesn't fit their bottom line......is it rigged? No but do they try and make certain narratives happen abso-freakin-lutley. As I stated in a previous thread NFL players are the ones that SHOULD have all guaranteed contracts but the boot lickers on this forum disagree and argue for the billionaires in this world who own these teams, sheep
    • I wont go quite so far as to say games are rigged.  You wouldnt have to work hard to convince me there was the occasional thumb on the scale but outright rigged? nah.   but collusion on the rest of the "business" of football, sure.  No one really believes that the only time the 32 owners act as one is during the negotiations of the CBA do they?
×
×
  • Create New...