Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

wATs0N pIcKEd MiaMi...WRONG


PanthersGOATFan336
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

nicksplat doug GIF

Deeeeerp. You don’t have to read between the lines when it comes to Miami, as you and others have had to desperately and idiotically do for Carolina. Idiots.

The Carolina Panthers had no further interest in trading for Deshaun Watson due to lack of clarity with his legal situation and Watson's plans with his no-trade clause, sources told ESPN's Jeremy Fowler.

Watson is facing 22 lawsuits alleging sexual assault and inappropriate behavior and has not played a down for the Texans this season. He has a no-trade clause in his contract, which he's willing to waive for the Dolphins.

The Panthers, who explored a potential Watson deal dating back to the offseason, got indications that Watson would be interested in playing for them but hadn't received that commitment in writing -- a customary step for a no-trade clause -- as of this week.

"[The Panthers] felt he would have come to Carolina, but [that] he wanted Miami first," a source told ESPN.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/32513207/deshaun-watson-legal-issues-no-trade-clause-uncertainty-caused-panthers-back-trade-pursuit-sources-say?platform=amp

Edited by onmyown
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, onmyown said:

Deeeeerp. You don’t have to read between the lines when it comes to Miami, as you and others have had to desperately and idiotically do for Carolina. Idiots.

The Carolina Panthers had no further interest in trading for Deshaun Watson due to lack of clarity with his legal situation and Watson's plans with his no-trade clause, sources told ESPN's Jeremy Fowler.

Watson is facing 22 lawsuits alleging sexual assault and inappropriate behavior and has not played a down for the Texans this season. He has a no-trade clause in his contract, which he's willing to waive for the Dolphins.

The Panthers, who explored a potential Watson deal dating back to the offseason, got indications that Watson would be interested in playing for them but hadn't received that commitment in writing -- a customary step for a no-trade clause -- as of this week.

"[The Panthers] felt he would have come to Carolina, but [that] he wanted Miami first," a source told ESPN.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/32513207/deshaun-watson-legal-issues-no-trade-clause-uncertainty-caused-panthers-back-trade-pursuit-sources-say?platform=amp

image.thumb.png.2c78c8e81a7c5fd65a447d40e7850a88.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The Dolphins are the only team that Watson is known to have waived his no-trade clause for, according to sources. Watson has not done the same for the Carolina Panthers or any other team, sources told ESPN.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/32515112/houston-texans-set-keep-deshaun-watson-nfl-trade-deadline-sources-say

It’s pretty damn clear we were prepared to give up whatever it takes and he repeatedly said nah. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would any team want this piece of trash?   All of these teams talk about only wanting high character players.   Garbage.   If Watson was a fringe player, he would never play in the NFL again.   But, these GM’s are willing to sell their souls for some wins.   And so are some of our fans.  What if it was one of your daughters being molested by Watson?

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AceBoogie said:

It’s pretty damn clear we were prepared to give up whatever it takes and he repeatedly said nah. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional. 

Eh...IDK about "clear." The one thing that seems to be clear is that the sources everyone has aren't saying the same things. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have not read this yet as it was just posted. I’ll see if there is any juicy details and post them up. 
    • And the QB before Rattler was worse! People are like well he only had one year of production. Analysts and malcontents always move the goal posts when they want. 
    • The 5th year allows tons of leverage when it comes to new contract talks. It's like having 20% more control of a contract. It allows cheaper numbers, cause well you have that 5years compared to 4. Plus you also have 6th, 7th, and 8th(I think) tagged years. Sure the QB doesn't play on it, but it allows teams to lower their offers given the years of control.  The deal with penix is he's also old too, so that 3rd year he's going to be 26/7 unlike 23.  You are also looking at the best side that penix can play and needs a new contract. It could easily be he's a bust and thus wasted this important era. The failcons should be comfy in the playoffs barring injuries. Now they missed on adding a edge making a key sack in the playoffs, to having spend the 8th overall on josh Rosen.  Honestly they should have drafted Rome Odunze. Pitts, Robinson, Allgeier, London, with a *healthy cousins.....that's 5/6 big problems for defenses. Most days they'd be able to drop 40.  Im super happy they didn't, but ask again in 3 years and I may regret.....
×
×
  • Create New...