Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam in our system in this team right now


musicman
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Snake said:

Sam would probably play better than Dak. People have always trashed the QB here but never trashed the Coordinators or coaching. Somehow it's always the QBs fault. What legit coaching staff goes into a season with backups at every position on the offensive line but one? Then what coaching staff bring a project QB with zero back up plan into a season? I said well maybe they know something I don't. Well I guess they don't. 

So then Sam is a better QB than Dak.  That is what that would mean. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Snake said:

At this point no but Dak isn't Dak without the best OL in football and a strong rushing attack. 

well, if you think if he went to Dallas he would then play better than Dak....wouldn't that mean he is a better QB than Dak? 

I mean, Tom Brady is going to have better results in Tampa than being on the Jets right now.  Nothing changes about Tom Brady's QB ability.   The results of him in NY would be poor.  He probably goes to the Super Bowl with Tampa. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Snake said:

Better a 🤡 than a crybaby like you... 

 

 

It is amazing how folks take this out of context just to rip on you. lol

 

Sam in Dallas very well could play better that Dak here. 

 

Edit to add; Bring Kellen Moore here, and give Dallas Brady? Sam probably plays better.

Edited by iamhubby1
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

It is amazing how folks take this out of context just to rip on you. lol

 

Sam in Dallas very well could play better that Dak here. 

 

Edit to add; Bring Kellen Moore here, and give Dallas Brady? Sam probably plays better.

Logic hasn't always been the best here. Notice how I'm always the insert QB hugger guy now too. The fact that Heinicke is playing better than Darnald should raise some eyebrows around here but it doesn't. 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Snake said:

Logic hasn't always been the best here. Notice how I'm always the insert QB hugger guy now too. The fact that Heinicke is playing better than Darnald should raise some eyebrows around here but it doesn't. 🤷‍♂️

 

Folks are frustrated right now. I would say that winning some games might help, but I'm not really sure it would at this stage.

 

The team looked good to start the year. If we could somehow get that mojo back. It would go a long way to soothe some of the ills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...