Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Worst Panthers offense of all time....

Jmac

By Jmac,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jmac Grand Master

Jmac

Posted
Posted

2010 and Clausen where better then this clownshow. And the thought was that they could never be worse then that group.

Many college offense's are better then what they put out every Sunday. Even CMC can not help this group.

Time to accept the fact that this is not getting better this season and can not get much worse. Stuck in quick sand with no body coming to pull them out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, The Natural said:

Did you watch in 2010? This is horrible, but it's not 2010 horrible.

exactly lol

i don’t think people who post threads like this have been around that long to say this

feel free to actually go back and look at the numbers….

it’s not that bad. But …it is bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted

This offense couldn’t even move the ball against high school defenses. Just flat out unacceptable for any NFL team to trot out an offense this bad. Even if a team were blatantly tanking they should have a better offense than we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jmac Grand Master

Jmac

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, onmyown said:

exactly lol

i don’t think people who post threads like this have been around that long to say this

feel free to actually go back and look at the numbers….

it’s not that bad. But …it is bad

I have watched every game since 2000..it is worse then 2010. 

 

Edited by Jmac
Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

2010 could not get first downs.  Completely anemic.  Darnold will sometimes get momentum until the eventual pick/consecutive incompletions.  But it is pretty f*cking awful that he has DJ Moore & CMC and can't even muster an average stat line.  It's unreal had bad he is with progressions.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jmac Grand Master

Jmac

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Mage said:

Don't get me wrong, this offense is horrible, but worse than 2010?  You have no clue what you are talking about if you think that.  

Clausen's Y/A was 5.2 that season.  Terrible

You can watch this sh%t show....in 2010 we all knew Fox was gone and the team sucked. They have some good players on Offense this year and no excuse for being so fuggin lame. 

Edited by Jmac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...