Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Turner>Joe Brady


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

The O didn't work with Teddy.  It didn't work with Sam.  It doesn't work with Cam.  

We avoided passing against the 30th ranked passing D in the league today.

Joe Brady has NEVER designed a good run game.  We could run against the Cardinals last week because CMC played out of his mind last week averaging 7 ypc and the Cardinals had a weak run D.  Our other RBs were below average last week.

We can't run and we can't pass.

We will suck as long as Brady runs the O.  If Rhule doesn't fire him by the end of the season, he probably needs to go too.  Hopefully we can find a way to keep Phil Snow.

Joe Brady lovers can circle their wagons and kiss Joe Brady's feet below on this thread.  

 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Guild said:

This week Brady should be fired.  If we don't make the playoffs (or do and really suck) the entire staff should be fired.

 

Snow isn't any better than the others.  Get him out too with his goddamn Wide 9.


Snow has had a bunch of good games.

 
Joe Brady has sucked all season.  The D looked bad today, because DJax had a BAAAD game and they ran to our weakness (left side) over and over. 

I don't think Brady even looks at tape of other teams.  He's a child playing madden.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Guild said:

This week Brady should be fired.  If we don't make the playoffs (or do and really suck) the entire staff should be fired.

 

Snow isn't any better than the others.  Get him out too with his goddamn Wide 9.

Everyone seems to be running a wide 9 these days. My frustration is strictly on substitutions. If a guy continues to fall down, get pancaked, or moved off the point of attack, then replace him with someone else, instead of watching the same damn C gap gash, over and over and over.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Brady deserves flack but it was the defense that has seen back to back first round picks an entire draft in 2020 and trades for multiple corners. You can do whatever you want with Joe but the philosophy has to change with it.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, philit99 said:

Everyone seems to be running a wide 9 these days. My frustration is strictly on substitutions. If a guy continues to fall down, get pancaked, or moved off the point of attack, then replace him with someone else, instead of watching the same damn C gap gash, over and over and over.

Fair

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...