Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dane Brugler Mock Draft 1.0 (from The Athletic)


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

I am not seeing it either.  If one was going to rise it would have happened by now.  Build the line and then circle back in 23 for a qb.  The timeline sucks but at least its a damn plan

All these guys had the opportunity to prove themselves first round worthy and none did.

They all have obvious flags or definitive ceilings. I would take a bunch of them in the 2nd or the 3rd but absolutely none of them in the first. Much less in the top 10.

Statistically, at least one SHOULD be successful in the NFL but I wouldn't be the team rolling that die in the top 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

That didn’t stop the Cards from drafting QBs in the first round in back to back years.

Long story short, you keep drafting a QB until you find your franchise QB.

I understand that mentality but you gotta pick your spots. This isn't that year.

We also have way more needs than just QB. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand people not sure about drafting QB but everything should be on the table. If we're able to move a bad contract or two we need to be going after some proven olinemen via free agency or trade. All our resources next year should be going to the offense in a league driven by scoring and I don't care who we have to move to make that happen even if it means losing a fan favorite. But it all begins with QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I understand that mentality but you gotta pick your spots. This isn't that year.

We also have way more needs than just QB. 

Oh no doubt! I am not arguing one should blindly reach for any QB or else you get in the situation we are in now. Im just saying the moment you feel you can get a franchise QB especially in the draft you pull the trigger.
 

With the rookie cap it makes even more sense to continuously draft a QB until you find your franchise QB versus sticking it out and waiting for the right opportunity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

until we have a QB, the pick has to be QB...I get the desire to draft a LT, but we can't seem to get there.

this is the correct way of thinking.

ultimately it will come down to a question of positional value. You aren’t going to spend a 1st round pick on interior linemen, and you have one OT already. So it’s a simple debate of QB or OT and which matters more.

Id love Cam to catch lightning in a bottle and play them out of range of a QB, I really would, (provided he remained good going forward) but right now it doesn’t seem to be trending that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

Oh no doubt! I am not arguing one should blindly reach for any QB or else you get in the situation we are in now. Im just saying the moment you feel you can get a franchise QB especially in the draft you pull the trigger.
 

With the rookie cap it makes even more sense to continuously draft a QB until you find your franchise QB versus sticking it out and waiting for the right opportunity. 

And I agree with that viewpoint entirely. However.....these guys have no clue what a successful QB even looks like, which is super scary. Also, it's hard to justify taking a suspect QB when elite OL may be on the board.

Darnold is done here as a starter. PJ is at best a backup and perhaps Cam can be another bridge QB. That's probably his ceiling. But, any of these options will be better with competent OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

And I agree with that viewpoint entirely. However.....these guys have no clue what a successful QB even looks like, which is super scary. Also, it's hard to justify taking a suspect QB when elite OL may be on the board.

Darnold is done here as a starter. PJ is at best a backup and perhaps Cam can be another bridge QB. That's probably his ceiling. But, any of these options will be better with competent OL.

I 100% agree. Hopefully we get build a OL but this franchise hasn’t drafted an OL in the first for more than a decade. If they aren’t gonna do the logical stuff maybe we’re better of them swing for the fences but this time at rookie QBs and not dumpster diving. 
 

To be honest if we went another decade of not drafting OL in the first round because we went QB instead, I would be okay with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

F that crap.

 

Pickett???? Not before the 3rd Round.

 

That Iowa center 20 times before Pickett.

I hope a team gets obsessed with a QB then in desperation to acquire that top 10 pick we are able to trade down and get a 2nd round pick as well. Then double down on the oline.    That is my hope.  

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

I 100% agree. Hopefully we get build a OL but this franchise hasn’t drafted an OL in the first for more than a decade. If they aren’t gonna do the logical stuff maybe we’re better of them swing for the fences but this time at rookie QBs and not dumpster diving. 
 

To be honest if we went another decade of not drafting OL in the first round because we went QB instead, I would be okay with that.

Yeah, I just disagree because we would likely end up squandering another promising QB talent by not protecting him.

Also, what you are describing is the thing I have posted on here before about. I am afraid we are in the midst of being the 1999-2017 Cleveland Browns and their comical QB carousel. I posted the side by side comparison and right now we are actually tracking to be a worse version of them during that time span.

That concerns me because that isn't typically an easy nosedive to pull up from. That kind of franchise dysfunction usually takes decades to recover from. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...