Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Pod: Joe Brady fired, Matt Rhule’s process, arm length, and what’s next?


ellis
 Share

Recommended Posts

I actually like a lot of what Ellis says and people should listen to the podcast, some of their comments about Brady were a bit surprising.

Ellis is actually more even keel than most fans.  Like he said, Tepper might have been wrong about Rhule, it happens.  Not only do most first time hires not work out, when you think about it most HC hires overall don't work out.

Would have a search committee helped the first time?  maybe, maybe not.  Rhule still could have been a candidate, Tepper might still have picked him.  The Giants had a "football person" (DG)  running their search and they wanted Rhule also.

The biggest concern with Rhule going into it was his lack of NFL experience, and that looks to be true at this point.  

If Rhule ends up getting fired it will be because of his inability to address the QB position and the offensive line, specifically with his free agent acquisitions.  The defensive side of the ball has actually been above average overall, their college evaluation will probably be ok relative to the rest of the league when we look back in a few years.  

Alot of us were very critical of the Teddy, Sam, Erving, and Elflein signings when they happened.  If Rhule gets fired it will be because of those decisions.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

I actually like a lot of what Ellis says and people should listen to the podcast, some of their comments about Brady were a bit surprising.

Ellis is actually more even keel than most fans.  Like he said, Tepper might have been wrong about Rhule, it happens.  Not only do most first time hires not work out, when you think about it most HC hires overall don't work out.

Would have a search committee helped the first time?  maybe, maybe not.  Rhule still could have been a candidate, Tepper might still have picked him.  The Giants had a "football person" (DG)  running their search and they wanted Rhule also.

The biggest concern with Rhule going into it was his lack of NFL experience, and that looks to be true at this point.  

If Rhule ends up getting fired it will be because of his inability to address the QB position and the offensive line, specifically with his free agent acquisitions.  The defensive side of the ball has actually been above average overall, their college evaluation will probably be ok relative to the rest of the league when we look back in a few years.  

Alot of us were very critical of the Teddy, Sam, Erving, and Elflein signings when they happened.  If Rhule gets fired it will be because of those decisions.

Rhule's downfall will directly stem from his desire to have total control as a first time HC.  Had he been supported by experienced NFL coordinators his transition to the pros would have likely been smoother without the poor personnel decisions we've witnessed in his first two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Rhule's downfall will directly stem from his desire to have total control as a first time HC.  Had he been supported by experienced NFL coordinators his transition to the pros would have likely been smoother without the poor personnel decisions we've witnessed in his first two years.

Not hiring a majority of his staff from the college ranks (and specifically the Baylor and Temple ranks) probably also would have helped.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Rhule's downfall will directly stem from his desire to have total control as a first time HC.  Had he been supported by experienced NFL coordinators his transition to the pros would have likely been smoother without the poor personnel decisions we've witnessed in his first two years.

What do you think would have helped him more, better OC or better QB and O-line?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not hiring a majority of his staff from the college ranks (and specifically the Baylor and Temple ranks) probably also would have helped.

Same question for you, would have better personnel decisions on the offensive side of the ball or better offensive staffing helped more?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Same question for you, would have better personnel decisions on the offensive side of the ball or better offensive staffing helped more?

You're missing the point.

There's one common denominator to all of these problems. That would be the guy who hired the coaches and had final say on the players.

The problem is Rhule. Better support in either area would just be postponing the inevitable.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

What do you think would have helped him more, better OC or better QB and O-line?

 

A real GM would have probably have solved many of the other issues. Rhule the executive never gave Rhule the HC a chance with his lack of understanding the salary cap and value. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have more faith in XL improving than I do in Tmac being a true number 1 recuever
    • Round 1. TMac arguably the best WR in the draft Round 2. Scour ton mentioned as a possible 1st round edge.     Texas A&M did not use him the same way Purdue did. After the 2023 season he was listed as a first round grade. I believe had Texas A&M used him like they did at Purdue he never makes it out of round 1. Round 3 Princely Umanmielen, we'll go by Princely.  Another highly graded player we got in a lower round. As the video suggests, even if he plays only on passing down it's a positive. Give him a couple of years to develop a he could be a three down player.  Round 4a Etienne IMO a huge upgrade over Blackshear. I can see him in a similar role as CMC without the heavy workload. He can run in between the tackles and has some shifty moves. Give Canales some flexibility. A fellow huddler pointed out UGA running backs don't see the field if they cannot pick up the blitz. Really good pick. Round 4b Ransom a hard hitting safety that has played three different positions on defense. Great pick Round 5a Cam Jackson a massive NT in round 5. I believe a solid rotational pick in a lower round. We added a beast that could make offenses quiver when he's lined up with Brown. Great Value  Round 5b Evans This is another player that can block and has good hands. He also had better seasons before 2024. As a rookie he's probably leaps and bounds better than Ian Thomas. I think he gives us a three headed monster at TE.  Round 6 Horn Jr. Many believe he's just going to be a KR/PR player. I believe there are going to be packages for him to get on the field as a WR. His speed with TMac and Thielen in the slot could be special. I'm really looking forward to seeing him in training camp. I've watched some film and he is very explosive.  Overall I love our picks. I honestly believe all of them will contribute this season. I don't believe we reached on one player in this draft.  This weekend we get a small look at these rookies     
×
×
  • Create New...