Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did Rhule ever answer post game?


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, CRA said:

 

yep.  We scored that TD with 3 minutes remaining. 

the argument set out above in the article is if you are down 15 in the middle of the 4th quarter.  Which is more than twice the time we had.  You have time to deal with the consequences of not converting.  A bad Panther offense doesn’t have the time to deal with not converting with 3 minutes on the clock and needing two scores. 

You done ran circles around them slapping them in the face each time bro. I thought they was trolling with the negative -they owe the world- football knowledge type of poo.

It was stupid and literally anyone that ever got hit in the face with a football and quit playing forever knows that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, KillaCamNewton said:

Lol okay man youre right a bunch of people on a message board know the analytics and situational strategy than a coach that gets paid 70 million dollars to make those decisions. 

Does Matt Rhule know more about football than people on a message board? Sure he does.

If only it were that easy.

Unfortunately, Rhule doesn't know enough about running a professional football team to beat even the likes of the Falcons, the Giants, the Dolphins and other teams that are generally acknowledged to be bottom feeders.

That's the problem.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Does Matt Rhule know more about football than people on a message board? Sure he does.

If only it were that easy.

Unfortunately, Rhule doesn't know enough about running a professional football team to beat even the likes of the Falcons, the Giants, the Dolphins and other teams that are generally acknowledged to be bottom feeders.

That's the problem.

Every NFL head coach knows more about football than us.  That doesn't mean NFL coaches don't do idiotic things that even a middle school coach would shake their head over.  Hell, in the moment, how many NFL coaches can't even manage timeouts and a playclock properly at the end of a game? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

On topic:

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/12/13/john-harbaugh-if-youre-going-to-need-a-two-point-conversion-better-to-go-for-it-early/
 

Harbaugh agrees with the 2pt early.

Rhule still sucks at everything else though.

This is still a dumbass take. You take the extra point because then you cut the lead to one possession and one two pointer. You only have to the stop opponents offense one time to tie.

You miss the 2pt then you're down two possessions. You literally have to get the ball back twice, you have to stop the opponent twice while they are chewing clock.  

Edited by OneBadCat
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, but those guys aren't depth guard signings, they're likely going to wait and see who has injuries or players under performing and then sign there. I also think that if Ickey really is going to be able to play at some point this year, that's where our guard depth comes from.  As if he gets to the point of being active, we'd then have 3 LT's on the roster with him, Freeling, and Walker, gotta think one of them not named Freeling gets kicked inside if needed.
    • lol imagine being Hill and this is what your coach thinks about you replacing a guy giving up over 4 goals per game.
    • I don't think Tyreek is a bad player to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
×
×
  • Create New...