Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Florio & Rich Eisen discuss Rhule & Tepper


BlitzMonster
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, grimesgoat said:

I hear a lot of people say he was a mid-tier college coach.  I'm genuinely curious, how would you tier the college football conferences.

For me its..

Tier 1: SEC

Tier 2: Big 10, Big 12

Tier 3: Pac 12, ACC

Tier 4: everyone else

If he were the commissioner of the Big 12 that would be one thing, he was the head coach of a couple of teams that were never going to seriously challenge the top tier teams in college football.

Hence mid-tier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I saw a pic somewhere(reddit maybe), 3 minutes leftd and maaaayyyybbbee 15% were still there. Facts are many other teams have that same problem- loins,jags,jets,wfts just to name a few. I doubt by seasons end the panthers would be last, even if it feels like it. 

Trust me, if you owned season tickets, you’d more than feel it 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Basbear said:

So who do you got/want?

I think the better question is "who does this job appeal to ?"  Just look at the team liabilities:

  • no QB
  • OL is a problem and needs lots of work
  • overall defensive performance has been checkered at best this season
  • missing a bunch of good draft picks for 2022
  • salary cap is starting to get hamstrung with all the high-dollar contracts that were handed out

I'd have to say not many coaches would find this job interesting.   

Edited by BlitzMonster
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Trust me, if you owned season tickets, you’d more than feel it 

according to ESPN(eww....) panthers are 7th(must be a lie) in attendance.....I feel they are closer to low 20s....

http://www.espn.com/nfl/attendance

 

heres is another https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2021/attendance.htm

 

Is this a bad joke/ruse?

 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hurney had hype when Tepper bought the team? Who was hyping Marty Hurney in 2018?

Honestly, I just don't think Tepper had the ability to evaluate football people. He let an absolute moron in Hurney sell him on the idea that he was one of the NFL's great drafters (😂) and then he let a college coach from a C level program sell him on his culture and program building abilities. Yikes.

Hurney hyped himself. Tepper bought it when he bought the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BlitzMonster said:

I think the better question is "who does this job appeal to ?"  Just look at the team liabilities:

  • no QB
  • OL is a problem and needs lots of work
  • overall defensive performance has been checkered at best this season
  • missing a bunch of good draft picks for 2022
  • starting to get hamstrung with all the high-dollar contracts that were handed out

I'd have to say not many coaches would find this job appealing.   

True, but have you seen the brinks truck Tepper can offer??

Plus hes building avengers south, that would be nice to be apart of....  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BlitzMonster said:

I think the better question is "who does this job appeal to ?"  Just look at the team liabilities:

  • no QB
  • OL is a problem and needs lots of work
  • overall defensive performance has been checkered at best this season
  • missing a bunch of good draft picks for 2022
  • salary cap is starting to get hamstrung with all the high-dollar contracts that were handed out

I'd have to say not many coaches would find this job interesting.   

New coaches pretty much always take over bad teams.

it's generally done with the mindset "Yeah they suck, but I can fix it".

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BlitzMonster said:

I think the better question is "who does this job appeal to ?"  Just look at the team liabilities:

  • no QB
  • OL is a problem and needs lots of work
  • overall defensive performance has been checkered at best this season
  • missing a bunch of good draft picks for 2022
  • salary cap is starting to get hamstrung with all the high-dollar contracts that were handed out

I'd have to say not many coaches would find this job interesting.   

Up and coming coaches believe in themselves and want an opportunity to prove it as a head coach.

The Panthers job isn't ideal, but how many teams that fire their head coaches are?  Winning organizations rarely have head coach openings.

I'm sure Tepper is more than capable of making an offer that will be hard to refuse.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Nah give Finesser and Dan Morgan the keys and see where they take it.....He was uber aggressive in the draft and trade deadlines stuff....I loved that. His free agents signes I hated......I was right it seems about them.....tho Id call it a push given Fox,Jones, and reddick saved the group. Elf has looked decent as a C too....Erv Im sure is already hurt again form stepping out of his car....

I hated it.  We let a ton of talent slide right past us in the name of adding picks.   Who is contributing right now from this draft?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Up and coming coaches believe in themselves and want an opportunity to prove it as a head coach.

The Panthers job isn't ideal, but how many teams that fire their head coaches are?  Winning organizations rarely have head coach openings.

I'm sure Tepper is more than capable of making an offer that will be hard to refuse.

Where you get apprehensive is wondering whether he makes said offer to the right person

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...