Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Florio & Rich Eisen discuss Rhule & Tepper


BlitzMonster
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Last I saw, I think it was nine.

Given Rhule had a year of experience as the Giants OL coach, I thought he'd be much better at figuring out our OL problem.  I thought that would be one of his strengths.  But it's just been a mess.

  • Poor talent evaluation in the free agency signings of Cameron Erving and Pat Elflein
  • virtually no playing time for the rookies (even though the vets in front of them stink)
  • what playing time the rooks got, they were constantly shifted to different positions 

It's like a seminar in how not to coach an NFL line.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

You seriously think someone else on the team just decided we should have a bunch of Temple and Baylor players on roster, or that Robby Anderson needed to get a big extension?

Yeah, sure 😕

See, this is key: Those examples you cited, Matt Rhule is in charge of every one of those things.

He hires the coordinators and assistant coaches. The strength and conditioning people are his people from Baylor. He has final say over roster decisions, depth chart rankings, free agent signings and draft picks. I mean hell, he even helped choose the GM.

In the area of football operations, there's nobody that the team has hired, signed, drafted, traded for or in any way acquired that Matt Rhule didn't sign off on. That's the kind of power David Tepper have him, and it's not like he argued against it. This is the sort of arrangement he wanted.

Knowing this, any suggestion that he should be absolved of blame for the current state of the organization is pretty weak.

I have no doubt we have a number of temple and baylor players on the roster because matt rhule is familiar with those guys and they are familiar with him.  That alone does not make them unqualified.

Same with any assistants.  Who better to execute your vision is people you are familiar with and have worked with.  If these guys are good, they will stand out and get hired away to other teams.  He had success before with these people, he probably thought he could do so again.  Frankly, I was surprised we ended up with Brady because Rhule did not have a relation with him - which makes me think Tepper had his hands on that one.

I guess we agree on all of this except you see it as a bad thing but I see it as probably what happens everywhere you look.  I can't imagine a new coach going to a team and hiring a bunch of strangers he's never met to be his closest advisors.

But your last sentence is a puzzler.  I feel like you may be putting words in my mouth there.  I was onboard with hiring the guy, but given the current state, I'd be ok if we moved on at this point.  He just doesn't seem ready yet and after almost 2 years, the fanbase is all out of patience.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, grimesgoat said:

I have no doubt we have a number of temple and baylor players on the roster because matt rhule is familiar with those guys and they are familiar with him.  That alone does not make them unqualified.

Same with any assistants.  Who better to execute your vision is people you are familiar with and have worked with.  If these guys are good, they will stand out and get hired away to other teams.  He had success before with these people, he probably thought he could do so again.  Frankly, I was surprised we ended up with Brady because Rhule did not have a relation with him - which makes me think Tepper had his hands on that one.

I guess we agree on all of this except you see it as a bad thing but I see it as probably what happens everywhere you look.  I can't imagine a new coach going to a team and hiring a bunch of strangers he's never met to be his closest advisors.

But your last sentence is a puzzler.  I feel like you may be putting words in my mouth there.  I was onboard with hiring the guy, but given the current state, I'd be ok if we moved on at this point.  He just doesn't seem ready yet and after almost 2 years, the fanbase is all out of patience.

Their origin isn't what shows them to be unqualified.

Their performance does.

The question of who better to execute your vision is a two part answer. At the pro level, it's people who are capable of coaching professional players to professional level results. If you're Matt Rhule however, and all you have is a college level vision, then your buddies from Temple and Baylor will do just fine.

And again, to be clear I don't begrudge Matt Rhule the ability to hire whomever he thinks is qualified.  Where the problem comes in is that Rhule himself isn't qualified for a pro level job, so why would he know how to hire pro level assistants?

The bottom line here is that we hired a college coach who brought with him a college staff to try and do a professional job...

...and they failed.

So here's to not making that mistake again.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The bottom line here is that we hired a college coach who brought with him a college staff to try and do a professional job...

...and they failed.

After 2 years in the NFL we see Rhule is clearly over his head.  No effective game plans.   No in game or in season adjustments.   Questionable personnel decisions.  Salary cap issues after handing out large contracts to guys who have underperformed.  A complete lack of young player development.  He's doing poorly at pretty much all the things an NFL coach is responsible for. 

So the big question becomes "can Rhule get better ?"  And that's a tough one.   Tepper is an experienced owner and Fitterer has many years in the NFL as well.  Can they guide Rhule to become a better head coach ?  Do they think Rhule is salvageable ? It's much easier to just fire an underperforming employee than to manage them toward better job performance.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BlitzMonster said:

After 2 years in the NFL we see Rhule is clearly over his head.  No effective game plans.   No in game or in season adjustments.   Questionable personnel decisions.  Salary cap issues after handing out large contracts to guys who have underperformed.  A complete lack of young player development.  He's doing poorly at pretty much all the things an NFL coach is responsible for. 

So the big question becomes "can Rhule get better ?"  And that's a tough one.   Tepper is an experienced owner and Fitterer has many years in the NFL as well.  Can they guide Rhule to become a better head coach ?  Do they think Rhule is salvageable ? It's much easier to just fire an underperforming employee than to manage them toward better job performance.  

You hire a head coach to guide an organization toward being a championship contender.

If you have to mold that coach into a guy that can do that (basically coach the coach) then you're essentially admitting he can't do that in his own ability. And if you've got to teach him what to do, how long does that take?

And geez, why the hell would any team want to go that route? 😖

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You hire a head coach to guide an organization toward being a championship contender.

If you have to mold that coach into a guy that can do that (basically coach the coach) then you're essentially admitting he can't do that in his own ability. And if you've got to teach him what to do, how long does that take?

And geez, why the hell would any team want to go that route? 😖

Every manager should help their direct reports get better at their jobs, including Tepper and Fitterer.  But you shouldn't be expected to teach the person absolutely every job task.  And that's what seems to be necessary with Rhule.   I really can't think of anything that he's doing well as a Head Coach in the NFL.   It would require a huge amount of effort to get him competent for this role. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, grimesgoat said:

Frankly, I was surprised we ended up with Brady because Rhule did not have a relation with him - which makes me think Tepper had his hands on that one.

Not true. According to the article posted here when Brady was fired, Rhule admitted he went out of his comfort zone and hired Brady as a splash move to impress Tepper.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BlitzMonster said:

 Tepper is an experienced owner and Fitterer has many years in the NFL as well.  Can they guide Rhule to become a better head coach ?

Tepper having experience running a hedge fund and being a minority owner does not mean he is an experienced majority owner. It also doesn't mean he has the experience to coach a football coach.

Fitterer is under Rhule in the hierarchy, so I highly doubt Rhule would listen to him when it comes to coaching decisions.

And as Mr Scot said, if Rhule needs coaching up, he's not the man to be an NFL head coach.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Captain Obvious said:

Don't care. I am officially all out of fugs to give about this damn team this year.

Over It Drama GIF by Holly Logan

 

 

I have already written this year off, but the reason I'm bitching so much right now is that I still have hope that we will move on from Rhule at year's end. 

If we keep him one more year, I'm honestly not bothering with this team until Rhule starts winning or he gets fired, whichever comes first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, BlitzMonster said:

Every manager should help their direct reports get better at their jobs, including Tepper and Fitterer.  But you shouldn't be expected to teach the person absolutely every job task.  And that's what seems to be necessary with Rhule.   I really can't think of anything that he's doing well as a Head Coach in the NFL.   It would require a huge amount of effort to get him competent for this role. 

There was a time when it would have been possible to have someone with experience help him transition into an NFL head coaching role.

That time would have been when he was hired, and the appropriate person would have been a former NFL head coach added to his staff.

That didn't happen, and two years in we're waaaay past the time when that would be practical.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, glenwo2 said:

Not sure if I've done this yet to you but I apologize for being such an asshat in my misguided defense of Sam.

I wanted so bad for him to be NOT-who-he-really-is that I ignored the warning signs you were putting out. 

Would like to see Sam run the Offense with the new OC

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...