Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft question...


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

That is true as well.. But then is the question do you want the 3rd or 4th best OT or the best Center in the draft?

People need to stop thinking in terms of ranking, teams look at grades.  I don't care if the next available OT is the 2nd or 5th one, does he have a similar grade as the center.  Once you factor positional value and need you might even take the OT if he has a slightly lower grade.

Think of grades on a 100 point scale.

If OT3 is a 90 and Center1 is a 90 I take the OT.

If OT3 is a 90 and Center1 is a 92 I might still take the OT, because of need and positional value.

If OT3 is a 84 and Center1 is a 92 Im taking the center or trying to trade down because that is a huge reach.

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

People need to stop thinking in terms of ranking, teams look at grades.  I don't care if the next available OT is the 2nd or 5th one, does he have a similar grade as the center.  Once you factor positional value and need you might even take the OT if he has a slightly lower grade.

Think of grades on a 100 point scale.

If OT3 is a 90 and Center1 is a 90 I take the OT.

If OT3 is a 90 and Center1 is a 92 I might still take the OT, because of need and positional value.

If OT3 is a 84 and Center1 is a 92 Im taking the center or trying to trade down because that is a huge reach.

 

 

 

 

I agree with this..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • If his approach to Mays and Nijman specifically means we will be using those resources to go hard on the defense then I am for it. But we cannot revert back to treating Center as an afterthought again otherwise he is going to find out the hard way the same as Fitterer did and Dan was here by his side to see that unfold firsthand.
    • I love the players selected, but we need an OL in the first 3 picks. 
    • I really hope Morgan & Tillis find a way to double dip with some heavy hitters on D. Lloyd/Mafe is ideal for me, though it would take some serious cap movement. I’d also be stoked for any combo of: Lloyd or Dean @ LB Mafe, Chubb, Hendrickson, Oweh, Phillips (can also kick inside in sub packages)   I do wonder if Lloyd is the splash and they don’t want to break the bank on EDGE, if they’re content seeing a healthy Pat + Scourton/Princely in year 2 with a true QB of the defense in Lloyd.    I know folks are down on Wallace but could Lloyd allow Wallace to be more of who he is rather than who we want him to be? He’s a Robin that needs a Batman…..not a main character. I also have concerns with Chenal and Quay at LB. I think Chenal gives me Turk 2.0 vibes but at LB. Quay’s blindspot is coverage and that is what we need help with at LB.
×
×
  • Create New...