Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft question...


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

That is true as well.. But then is the question do you want the 3rd or 4th best OT or the best Center in the draft?

People need to stop thinking in terms of ranking, teams look at grades.  I don't care if the next available OT is the 2nd or 5th one, does he have a similar grade as the center.  Once you factor positional value and need you might even take the OT if he has a slightly lower grade.

Think of grades on a 100 point scale.

If OT3 is a 90 and Center1 is a 90 I take the OT.

If OT3 is a 90 and Center1 is a 92 I might still take the OT, because of need and positional value.

If OT3 is a 84 and Center1 is a 92 Im taking the center or trying to trade down because that is a huge reach.

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

People need to stop thinking in terms of ranking, teams look at grades.  I don't care if the next available OT is the 2nd or 5th one, does he have a similar grade as the center.  Once you factor positional value and need you might even take the OT if he has a slightly lower grade.

Think of grades on a 100 point scale.

If OT3 is a 90 and Center1 is a 90 I take the OT.

If OT3 is a 90 and Center1 is a 92 I might still take the OT, because of need and positional value.

If OT3 is a 84 and Center1 is a 92 Im taking the center or trying to trade down because that is a huge reach.

 

 

 

 

I agree with this..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No one's saying LaMelo has no blame we're responding to you acting like he's the reason they lost. The scapegoating and blaming the teams woes on his personality is where it's like Cam Newton all over again. It was a failure on multiple fronts and primarily Lee's. Dude said ON AIR pregame that they had to protect the paint and if that was his gameplan going in he couldn't have botched it more. As the commentators said Ball's a rhythm guy and Orlando was preventing him for getting any kind of flow going. I'm a normie watching on TV and said they needed to bait them into fouling to combat that. They didn't even try until the 2nd half when it was too late. I think it's fair to expect the star to overcome whatever but LaMelo was not the problem in that game and he's not what is holding the team back. He's the only reason they're flirting with being a great team. I kinda put the center play on Lee too. Moose is great until he's up against a big who can body him. We've always known that and that's what Kalkbrenner is for. I don't know if it would have changed much but Kalkbrenner should have had more minutes than him.  And moving forward with the center position, I just think it's the time to trade Diabate while his stock's high and that's not an indictment of his game. He's like an evolved combination of Biyombo and PJ. He's a great rim protector and the strength issue is just what you're going to have to deal with if you want that. But Kalkbrenner is perfectly capable of protecting the rim and we gotta get away from the undersized centers or it'll always be a problem for us.
    • Honestly its why that Jalen Coker grab was a big deal.  I'd been warming up to the idea of a sadiq pick and was adamantly against a receiver...but this altered my train of thought.  I mean For instance, Cade Otton signed for 3 yr 30 mil contract...thats not dramatically different than the rookie payscale for #19 (4 year 20 mil with 5th year option), however you KNOW otton is decent...no clue if Sadiq will be anything. 
×
×
  • Create New...