Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can't make it up . . .


BrianS
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, joemac said:

You really think? I don’t think so. I think they’re going to roll with Sam again and build him the best o line they can. Then see what happens after that. 

I think they're getting a new QB.  Nobody thinks Sam is actually the answer. He may be on the roster and he may even start games next year (especially if we trade for a player made of glass), but I think they'll spend significant capital to improve the QB position, either with the first round pick or perhaps trading for someone (like Jimmy g)

Edited by mav1234
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I think they're getting a new QB.  Nobody thinks Sam is actually the answer. He may be on the roster and he may even start games next year (especially if we trade for a player made of glass), but I think they'll spend significant capital to improve the QB position, either with the first round pick or perhaps trading for someone (like Jimmy g)

Jimmy G would be a mistake 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BrianS said:

"Deonte Brown isn't ready."

I don't know what his grades looked like.  He only played a few series.  I noticed him twice.

On the 4th down where Sam tried to sneak it left?  Yea, Deonte moved his man back.  Might not have gotten in the end zone, but he definitely got enough for a first.

And then this time:

image.png.2bb879e0fb21134e920d4e7b10db9d23.png

The guy NOT getting pushed back into Sam's lap?  Yea, that's Deonte again.

Again, haven't seen his grades, he didn't play a bunch . . . but are you (*$@ing kidding me?

I missed the game and just watched the Youtube highlights, seemed like the OL looked a lot better on I'm guessing their 2nd drive when Deonte was in? Every snap on the first drive it was chaos but when Brown was in at least Sam could step in to that quarter of the line for an extra half second.  But then they took him out for that 4th and 1 near the goal line, where that's the optimal time to have Deonte and Cam in a package like that? I'm guessing Rhule was hoping Sam could get in the endzone to further justify his reason for taking him, but don't understand why you'd take the brick wall out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, joemac said:

You really think? I don’t think so. I think they’re going to roll with Sam again and build him the best o line they can. Then see what happens after that. 

Joe Person thinks they’ve already decided to move on from Sam. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I assume we were the only team that needed upgrades at 4 of 5 OL spots and knew their OL was their weak spot. I also think when you get to your 10th pick in the draft, that's when you take a chance on an OL who was a 2nd/3rd round grade on talent instead of taking a long snapper, which is an undrafted position. I understand passing on him, but you had 3 6ths and a huge OL need. You take Smith over a LS. Simple as that. We made a mistake and KC didn't.

Thank you, I didn’t have the energy to respond myself. What irritates me more then anything is Rhule was so confident with Eflein, Erving and re-signing John Miller to a one year deal that he never considered drafting Smith. Man he was stoked about picking his man-crush Fletch. Fletch walked his happy ass up here, sucked in training camp and then got “injured” at a convenient time so Rhule didn’t have to cut him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I assume we were the only team that needed upgrades at 4 of 5 OL spots and knew their OL was their weak spot. I also think when you get to your 10th pick in the draft, that's when you take a chance on an OL who was a 2nd/3rd round grade on talent instead of taking a long snapper, which is an undrafted position. I understand passing on him, but you had 3 6ths and a huge OL need. You take Smith over a LS. Simple as that. We made a mistake and KC didn't.

I’m with you and would have preferred that pick. My only point of contention is it likely was the medical staff that steered the staff away from picking Smith. Hard to fault them, if so. The coaches aren’t medical experts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

I’m with you and would have preferred that pick. My only point of contention is it likely was the medical staff that steered the staff away from picking Smith. Hard to fault them, if so. The coaches aren’t medical experts. 

It’s a calculated risk. We either take Trey with his blood clot issues or pick Fletch and let him walk his happy ass up here. If Rhule had any clue how bad our line was he would’ve picked Trey. Hell, he probably would’ve picked Creed Humphrey over the invisible TMJ. Rhule thought our o-line was good to go and that’s why no one has any confidence in him. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Newbie said:

Joe Person thinks they’ve already decided to move on from Sam. 

And we just pay him 19 mil next year to do what? Who’s gonna trade for him? Even if we eat a chunk of his salary? Dude is a bum. Ride him to one of the top QBs next year and move on 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, joemac said:

And we just pay him 19 mil next year to do what? Who’s gonna trade for him? Even if we eat a chunk of his salary? Dude is a bum. Ride him to one of the top QBs next year and move on 

If Rhule is brought back next year he knows he has to win now. There’s no way he’s hitching his star to Darnold’s wagon again. We’re about to witness every short sighted bad decision imaginable. We need to can this fool now before it gets really ugly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years (Brown is the only current player I think there is even an argument to be made over T-Mac there), with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
    • Laughing at Slayton (Mooney or Calvin Austin III), but telling me that Coker is the next best thing since sliced bread...You laughing at Theo Johnson in reference to our guys too? LOL No one in their right mind thinks Nabers is anything but a stud (definitely top 10 if not 5 potential). You do realize that Thomas was in a new system with a furst-time coach last year (with a questionable QB to boot)? And yet still, it's possible that he eclipses even T-mac (not saying that he will). They didn't even mention Travis Hunter. In any event, we're not in the top half. Draft another legit receiver, and we will be. 
    • Absolutely, very fair assessment of the team. 
×
×
  • Create New...