Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pep Hamilton is top choice for OC now


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Waldo said:

How does Pep feel about that?

Does this bring us closer to having to deal with a Watson trade and that aftermath? 

Please god no, last thing I want is a Watson trade.

Sure, I'd love for him to be our QB, him and CMC would be a dangerous combo in the backfield.  But the cost is just FAR too high, it would cost us our first rounder this year and likely the next 2 years, and still possibly more on top.

We need to use that first rounder on an OT this year, and without our 2nd or 3rd rounders this year, I'm not on board for giving up 3 first rounders for a QB on a huge contract, hard pass.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also found it utterly depressing that the GM made sure note it was Rhule’s hire.   Not his.  He was there if Matt wanted input but Matt doesn’t know offense Rhule is picking the OC. 
 

what exactly is the point of Fitt? Tepper could save some money and not have a fake GM.  Rhule is a bad version of Bill O’Brien. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Also found it utterly depressing that the GM made sure note it was Rhule’s hire.   Not his.  He was there if Matt wanted input but Matt doesn’t know offense is picking the OC. 
 

what exactly is the point of Fitt? Tepper could save some money and not have a fake GM.  Rhule is a bad version of Bill O’Brien. 

Right man that's why I was confused when you didn't believe Rhule had that power earlier because they've already said it before. It is whack af though regardless...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Many of you are trashing the "run first" approach to offense.  Tennessee has a bye this week. 

Last 3 years how many Tenn type teams have made the postseason? 

they are the exception to the rule.   Those always exist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fox007 said:

Right man that's why I was confused when you didn't believe Rhule had that power earlier because they've already said it before. It is whack af though regardless...

Didn’t believe it.  Do now.  
 

Team is hopeless.  Tepper is going to kill this team and then move it once they have to put tarps over the empty seats.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, CRA said:

Didn’t believe it.  Do now.  
 

Team is hopeless.  Tepper is going to kill this team and then move it once they have to put tarps over the empty seats.  

Yea you were just thinking along the lines of:
"There's no way this idiot gave a shitty college coach that power, pfff who the fug does that"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Killah_Ray said:

If we bring in Pep, only thing that tells me is we're going all in for Watson...

 

Which means we're fuged....

Pep doesn’t have a relationship with Watson.   Pep was only in Hou this season.   

and there is zero indication Watson wants to come here.   We know he would waive his trade clause for us. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

last year had 4.

1. Ten
2. CLE
3. Bal
4. WASH

2019 had 3

1. Ten
2. SF
3. Bal 

4 of the 14

3 of the 12

with teams built around the QB taking home the rings.   

that doesn’t scream you should be building your team like the Titans in 2022.  

I just don’t see the point do not building your team in favor of the rules.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...