Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sunday Playoff Games


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

Pretty sure the completion % for Allen has always been where Cam struggled to reach even in his prime

A lot of it was offensive system. The Bills run the offense we should've ran. They take shots but there are plenty of quick hitter layups designed for YAC too. Shula had none of that. Virtually all of Cam's passes were downfield to blanketed receivers with hot/cold hands. We were consistently near the bottom of the league in YAC.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

A lot of it was offensive system. The Bills run the offense we should've ran. They take shots but there are plenty of quick hitter layups designed for YAC too. Shula had none of that. Virtually all of Cam's passes were downfield to blanketed receivers with hot/cold hands. We were consistently near the bottom of the league in YAC.

True, Cam was adjusting great to the checkdowns in 2018. prior to that he did have that habit of overthrowing the intermediate stuff the first couple of drives before he'd settle in. Maybe should have recognized that and let him settle in before calling those plays in hindsight

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

A lot of it was offensive system. The Bills run the offense we should've ran. They take shots but there are plenty of quick hitter layups designed for YAC too. Shula had none of that. Virtually all of Cam's passes were downfield to blanketed receivers with hot/cold hands. We were consistently near the bottom of the league in YAC.

Our YAC numbers were bad because Cam had bad ball placement. 

He rarely hit short to medium routes in stride. Recievers constantly had to adjust for him breaking their stride  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Our YAC numbers were bad because Cam had bad ball placement. 

He rarely hit short to medium routes in stride. Recievers constantly had to adjust for him breaking their stride  

We get it, man. You hate Cam. You'd rather watch us lose without Cam than win without him and watch him celebrate.

And you're wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We get it, man. You hate Cam. You'd rather watch us lose without Cam than win without him and watch him celebrate.

And you're wrong.

Why would I care if he celebrates.

The fact is he underperformed for us.

He should have been Mahomes, Wilson, Rodgers good.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The teams this 2nd year player (can’t really blame the years before he was drafted on him) was playing were going 100% as most do most weeks in the NFL. The whole argument is about his play during that period and how well was he actually playing. I’m with you on the winning though. Just start winning and fans will get excited. Start getting in the playoffs and winning and we won’t care how his PFF or box score stats look. 200 yards a game to 400 yards a game, start scoring and winning playoffs games and 99% of fans will buy in. 
    • Yeah, we are gonna be raw.  Wonnum, for the past 3 years, has been averaging 8 sacks a season (4 in one season when he missed half a season).  I am OK, but yes, they will be thrown to the fire.
    • I like this because it means one or both of the rookies will be thrust into a bigger role right away and we can see what they might be. I don't like this because it just makes our team that much younger and inexperienced.  You need vets to help the young guys learn, I just hope we aren't going too far in the opposite direction.  All our FA signings were guys just coming off their rookie deals too, I get why we're doing it, but having the savvy vets help in other ways too.
×
×
  • Create New...