Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It Seems Official Tom Brady Retires


Michael G
 Share

Recommended Posts

Tom Brady retires as the player with the most Super Bowls in NFL history and an assured spot in the Pro Football Hall of Fame as soon as he's eligible for enshrinement in five years.

Brady also leaves the NFL unlike many older players — his play didn't drop off as he aged. Brady was 485-of-719 passing for 5,319 yards and 43 touchdowns in 2021. He led the NFL in completions, attempts, yards and TDs this season and will likely finish in the top two of NFL MVP voting with Green Bay Packers QB Aaron Rodgers. If Brady wins the MVP award, he’ll finish his career as a four-time MVP. Brady is currently tied with Rodgers, Jim Brown and Johnny Unitas at three. Only Peyton Manning (5) has more MVPs.

Brady retires as the NFL's all-time leader in passing yards, passing touchdowns, quarterback wins in both the regular and postseason, Super Bowl appearances (10) and Super Bowl victories (7). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tired of all the media outlets calling him the undisputed best and not even a question. Yes there is. No one mentions Spygate and realizes how great it is to know the defensive signals of the other teams your facing. At least his first 3 SBs, maybe even 4, are tainted with Spygate. Also considering how QB friendly the league became, and he even had a rule made up from him because the refs screwed up so bad when they played the Raiders, I don't consider him the best. Top 2 or 3, yeah, but Montana is still #1 to me. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Tired of all the media outlets calling him the undisputed best and not even a question. Yes there is. No one mentions Spygate and realizes how great it is to know the defensive signals of the other teams your facing. At least his first 3 SBs, maybe even 4, are tainted with Spygate. Also considering how QB friendly the league became, and he even had a rule made up from him because the refs screwed up so bad when they played the Raiders, I don't consider him the best. Top 2 or 3, yeah, but Montana is still #1 to me. 

people are going to dismiss it because of his success after leaving new england. if he had fallen flat on his face in tampa bay, the narrative would be exactly what you posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Tired of all the media outlets calling him the undisputed best and not even a question. Yes there is. No one mentions Spygate and realizes how great it is to know the defensive signals of the other teams your facing. At least his first 3 SBs, maybe even 4, are tainted with Spygate. Also considering how QB friendly the league became, and he even had a rule made up from him because the refs screwed up so bad when they played the Raiders, I don't consider him the best. Top 2 or 3, yeah, but Montana is still #1 to me. 

FWIW, Montana is still #1 in my mind, too.  The sample size is so different comparing them is difficult, but Montana always was at his best in Super Bowls.  He threw 11 TDs, 0 interceptions, and had an average rating of around 122.5 in his four games.

Brady was very pedestrian in two games against the Giants and the last Pats game against the Rams.  He was great "down the stretch" in the first Rams game and against the Falcons.  He had a Jekyll and Hyde game against the Seahawks.  His teams were 7-3 in Super Bowls, but had two OCs not outsmarted themselves in the dying minutes/seconds, that would be 5-5.  Those two games are not on him, but it does offer some perspective.  He was the MVP in both of those games, I believe, and would almost certainly not have been had the Seahawks handed the ball to Lynch one more time and the Falcons turned a 1st and 10 on the Pats 22 with 4:00 left into a FG rather than a punt.

I'm not bashing Brady, he is on the short list of SB great performers.  But it is not as cut and dried as the media likes to make it.

His announcement completely validates what those closest to him were saying, both in the decision and in the timing.  I'm sure he has a well-deserved date coming in Foxborough prior to some game next season.  He was a 6th round draft pick who very easily could have had a short career as a backup, but when he got his shot, he made the most of it.  While I got tired of him being force-fed on us and his  whining during games whenever a defender got within 5-feet of him, he leaves behind quite a legacy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, demcj said:

people are going to dismiss it because of his success after leaving new england. if he had fallen flat on his face in tampa bay, the narrative would be exactly what you posted.

He pulled a LeBron James and went to the most stacked team out there. Yes they were 7-9 the year before he got there but they had a ton of cap space and high draft picks and their D was stacked as well as their OL and weapons. Most favorable situation imaginable for a QB to just step into. Plus Arians gets a lot of poo but he had success in Indy and Arizona so it's not like he's some total scrub HC. Brady didn't even play all that well in the playoffs the year the Bucs won. Got lucky to play a losing record Washington team, Brees meltdown, Packers game he threw 3 terrible INTs and their D carried them in the SB against Mahomes with no OL due to injuries. 

 

Is Brady one of the top QBs to play the game? Yes, for sure. Is he better than guys like Rodgers, Manning, Montana, Marino, even Mahomes so far? Nope. Super Bowl wins are team accomplishments, not individual. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...