Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Rams will be the away team in their stadium


Wes21
 Share

Recommended Posts

Its kind of a weird thing to think about, but the Rams will be the away team for the Super Bowl.  Each conference takes turns being the home team, and the NFC was the home team last year.  But I guess if any team is prepared to be the away team in their own stadium, its the Rams who share a stadium with another team and regularly have half the stadium filled with opposing teams fans.

So the Bengals will get their choice of uniforms, and the Rams will call the coin toss.  I would assume the Bengals get the home locker room as well.  Normally I wouldn't even think about that, but Jon Gruden made a comment that SoFi stadium made the visitor's locker room awkward...The locker room here is the most bizarre thing I’ve ever seen," Gruden said. "I mean you can’t see anybody. It’s like a maze. Whoever contorted this visiting locker room, I’d like to meet this guy, see what his idea was."  

https://sports.yahoo.com/jon-gruden-blasts-maze-of-a-locker-room-weather-delay-at-roofed-so-fi-stadium-195255272.html

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cardiackat88. said:

I had always wondered how they would choose home/away teams if it was Jets/Giants or Rams/Chargers in their shared stadiums. I just talked about this yesterday to my roomate.

Thanks for answering that for me without having to google it.

Since you are curious about the details, I will throw in something that Pat Kirwan has said.  He said one of the things that he hated about working for the Jets was that it was the Giants stadium and the Jets were just tenants.  He said you could walk thru the facility and it became obvious who's stadium it really was, even when they tried to dress it up in Jets gear during Jets home games.  I've never been to that old stadium so I have no idea how true it was.  But he said it made it harder for them to recruit free agents, etc.  I believe the Jets corrected that mistake when they built the new stadium, and have an actual joint ownership stake now.

He was very vocal when the Chargers were moving, and said he would recommend they get their own stadium or find a way to become equal partners. He said it would be a mistake to become tenants in another teams stadium like the Jets were.  And that's exactly what the Chargers ended up doing...becoming tenants in Rams stadium.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Wes21 said:

Since you are curious about the details, I will throw in something that Pat Kirwan has said.  He said one of the things that he hated about working for the Jets was that it was the Giants stadium and the Jets were just tenants.  He said you could walk thru the facility and it became obvious who's stadium it really was, even when they tried to dress it up in Jets gear during Jets home games.  I've never been to that old stadium so I have no idea how true it was.  But he said it made it harder for them to recruit free agents, etc.  I believe the Jets corrected that mistake when they built the new stadium, and have an actual joint ownership stake now.

He was very vocal when the Chargers were moving, and said he would recommend they get their own stadium or find a way to become equal partners. He said it would be a mistake to become tenants in another teams stadium like the Jets were.  And that's exactly what the Chargers ended up doing...becoming tenants in Rams stadium.

Maybe it was because giants were usually on fox and jets on cbs, but I swear that entire field and atmosphere looked drastically different on TV depending on which team was playing that day (when not facing each other).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Looks like a set up to me.  Tampa, now LA?

Shenanigans.

 

Former player says it's rigged. We, as Panthers fans have experienced two obviously rigged Superbowls. The guy in the interview above said they knew every play the other team was running BEFORE the game. Hmmm, sounds familiar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

 

Former player says it's rigged. We, as Panthers fans have experienced two obviously rigged Superbowls. The guy in the interview above said they knew every play the other team was running BEFORE the game. Hmmm, sounds familiar.

It’s not personal, just business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...