Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FA QB Options


Michael G
 Share

Recommended Posts

https://catcrave.com/2022/02/16/7-quarterbacks-carolina-panthers-target-2022-free-agency/3/

This Fansided (Catcrave) Article discusses 7 possible FA QBs that could be brought in to compete with Darnold. Let's assume we won't draft a young signal caller and we can't bag another more established signal caller via Trade.

The Players Mentioned were

1. Jacoby Brissette

2. Marcus Mariota

3. Jameis W.

4. Tyrod Taylor

5. Mike White

6. Mitch Turbisky

7. Brandon Allen

Which of these guys has the best shot of helping this team win some games. Explain your reasoning if you please and debate away. (Cam is not on this list but feel free to add him. I can't stop you!)

Edited by Michael G
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would probably take Mitch if we found a way to trade Darnold. Besides that really no point. None of those are gonna move the needle, rather getting us another 8-6th pick; missing out on the most highly regarded QB’s next year.

Edited by shaq
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best shot? Eh....depends on how we build and how we run the offense.

Taylor/Brissett will not actively lose you games and will manage them relatively effectively. 

Winston/Trubisky are gambles on gunslingers. Gonna have some high highs and low lows. 

If you go deep passing offense:

1. Winston

2. Trubisky

If you go conservative, rush based offense:

1. Taylor

2. Brissett

 

Not interested at all in the rest other than for backup purposes.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mitch signed with Buffalo because he wanted a stable situation to regroup. I highly doubt he's going to jump right back into another full blown poo show.

The writer seem to suggests a lot of these FAs would be intrigued because they are assured a shot to start going up against Darnold. I guess Mitch would have to decide if starting again is worth the risks of getting caught up in the Mess here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mitch signed with Buffalo because he wanted a stable situation to regroup. I highly doubt he's going to jump right back into another full blown poo show.

Right, he'd rather be a backup on a playoff team and maybe get his Nick Foles moment at some point in the playoffs. Then get his one decent contract wherever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, parker said:

Doesn't he have consistent injury problems?

Mariota hasn't really played much the last couple of years. He did have some injury issues at Tennessee. If He's gotten better watching and learning he should be healed up. He might be worth a look. I guess injury is always a possibility though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can understand the logic. Going for 2 made sense the first time considering how far down we were. Then you don't get it and are basically forced to go for it the second time, too. Way down the list of concerns we have, IMO.
    • Rozeboom needs to get better before he's a JAG.
    • The successful teams in the NFL right now have one thing in common: Patience. Not just with their QB, but with every facet of the program. There are going to be successes and failures, but no one panics and makes reactive decisions. Look at the Eagles, the Bills, the Ravens, the Packers, and hell, even the (newly successful) Lions. All of them showed patience with their QB's growth, let their coaches do their jobs, have drafted well, developed their own players, and plugged holes in their roster and organization with players and situations that made sense. That's what we need. And if that isn't what we have now, we need to make moves to get it there. If that means they need to blow it up to start over, then blow it up and start it over the right way. If that means to change their approach from top to bottom, change it now. But the blueprint of success is out there in the league, teams just think they know better, or they don't have the discipline to follow through.
×
×
  • Create New...