Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mitchell Trubisky is the best play


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Ah, my bad. Here I thought I was responding to someone trying to have an honest conversation. I see what's going on now.

I am trying to have an honest conversation.

I'm not letting my college Fandom blind me to reality. You, Corners and the rest of the Chapel Hill Chalkies can't stop spamming the board about Mitchell and Sammy as the second coming of John the Baptist and Jesus respectively.

There are plenty of Duke and NC State fans on this board.. Find me all the threads about signing Mike Glennon, Jacoby Brissett or Daniel Jones this offseason... all local school QBs with as much or more success in the league as ya boi.

Mitch Trubisky is Sam Darnold with better hair and a dumber name. And less balls.

We weren't the only qb needy team last year. He could've gone to Washington and battled against Kyle Allen and Taylor Heinicke. NO, IND, DET... there were options if he wanted to see the field.

When Cam got cut, he bet on himself and waited for an opportunity to compete.

Mitch could never...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He's not coming here. He's already endured a dumpster fire in Chicago under Nagy. That's why he jumped on the opportunity to go to Buffalo as a clear backup without shopping for a potential situation to compete for a starting job. He was looking for a reset in a stable situation. He's not going to jump right back into a dumpster fire. I honestly think he'd resign in Buffalo as the backup before he'd come here to compete for the starting job. He knows he almost certainly only has one more opportunity to legit compete for a starting job. He's not going to waste that on a situation like ours where failure is virtually guaranteed.

Sorry, that's just the sad reality.

We'll see if that strategy worked out in the long run for Jameis this offseason.  Although it made much more sense with Jameis since Brees was old and on the verge of retirement so there was actual opportunity for him.  Trubisky has zero shot unless Josh Allen is injured.  Not sure how much it improves your stock to warm the bench for two seasons with virtually zero meaningful snaps.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 4Corners said:

Yep. Troll detected. Probs NCST, UK, duke fan with nothing better to do. 

I mean I graduated from UNC and I think it sounds a bit like mental gymnastics to suggest that Trubisky is actually a genius strategist by foregoing a starting opportunity to instead hold a clipboard on the bench for 1-2 seasons because you aren't being handed your ideal situation.  You're just as likely to drift into obscurity essentially taking 1-2 gap years as you are of getting another starting opportunity down the line.  If I'm a QB who is confident in my own ability, I'm not taking that opportunity for granted by simply hoping something better comes along in the future.

As the great philosopher and orator Marshall Bruce Mathers III once said, "You only get one shot, do not miss your chance to blow.  This opportunity comes once in a lifetime".

Edited by MasterAwesome
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

6 hours ago, Stumpy said:

It must suck having to defend Mitchell this hard... imagine Trubisky being the best QB your football program has produced in almost 100 years 🤣🤣🤣

 

5 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Ah, my bad. Here I thought I was responding to someone trying to have an honest conversation. I see what's going on now.

Quick, name the 5 best NC State qbs ever. Then name any 5 UNC qbs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I've talked about plenty of QBs. Y'all just get hung up on the ones you want to get hung up on. Again, a you problem.

Perhaps, but a long look in the mirror would do you some good. I have no idea why you even want to moderate this board, you aren’t even a fan of the team anymore, if you ever were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Panthera onca said:

Perhaps, but a long look in the mirror would do you some good. I have no idea why you even want to moderate this board, you aren’t even a fan of the team anymore, if you ever were.

Find where I've said it would be a good idea for us to pursue Mitch Trubisky this off-season. You're just triggered because of where a guy went to school and now you're lashing out at me because... ???

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...