Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Apparently Rhule spoke to Charlotte reporters

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted

Jimmy G is a player who is constantly being given credit for stuff he didn’t do. 
He didn’t lead the 49ers to the Super Bowl their defense did. He lost them the Super Bowl. 
He threw 75 yards in the NFC championship game and his deficiencies were known due to the heavy amount of running. 49ers even back then knew they couldn’t put the team on his back and hope to win. 
Some stupid team will overpay. I hope to god it isn’t us. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
53 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I guess but would you have been more upset if he said BC is our LT this year meaning that we have no desire to take any of the top 3 LTs if they are there?

I'm fully prepared to watch us take a quarterback even if they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, tiger7_88 said:

Oddly enough, I would have thought “getting the staff right” should have been a primary emphasis of his FIRST offseason prior to his FIRST season.

But thats just me.

I'd like to think that would have started with the head coach.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michael G Mentor

Michael G

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

So our IOL is a total question mark and all of our RB's are under 205 pounds so we're going to run down the middle now? Mcadoo off to a good start already

Agreed- I'm hoping they work hard to change the IOL and add a big back if this is the new philosophy. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Michael G said:

Agreed- I'm hoping they work hard to change the IOL and add a big back if this is the new philosophy. 

It's being hinted that McAdoo wants big road graders.

We don't exactly have a lot of guys who fit that profile right now.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Spanish Grand Master

Ricky Spanish

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Michael G said:

Agreed- I'm hoping they work hard to change the IOL and add a big back if this is the new philosophy. 

If we go into the season with Eiflein as our starting Center, we are fuged. 

Whoever starts instead of Miller is addition by subtraction. The fact he started as much as he did baffles me...

Jesus I'm getting upset again thinking about how stupid the OL was managed all season. It made no damn sense whatsoever and reminds me of how little hope I have going into next season. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michael G Mentor

Michael G

Posted
Posted

Sounds like we might be moving away from the WCO base (haven't looked at McAdoo's past philosophy)

I remember the Giant Offense being kinda WC-like under Macadoo. I guess he's moving away from that philosophy. They used the shotgun a lot, but still threw a lot short passes. He had Eli throw a bunch of screens. I read somewhere that they were a zone blocking scheme like what we currently use so I wonder if (based on what Rhule said) we are going to go more Gap/Power...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

WCO is what Brady ran (influenced by Sean Payton)

My understanding was Peyton stole form every single system and formed his "own". He did change it up lots once Drew got older. Basically Payton did what smart coaches do, wonder why thats soooo hard to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Billy Love Mentor

Billy Love

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, jackson113 said:

 

 

I’d like to see evidence of “football intelligence” from Matt Rhule. That seems to be a BUZZ word of his. Preaches that his players and coaches need to be tough, accountable with great football intelligence…yet he has not shown that he processes any of these characteristics himself. He is full of sh!t, a very successful bulls!t artist, but full of sh!t none the less. 

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Billy Love said:

I’d like to see evidence of “football intelligence” from Matt Rhule. That seems to be a BUZZ word of his. Preaches that his players and coaches need to be tough, accountable with great football intelligence…yet he has not shown that he processes any of these characteristics himself. He is full of sh!t, a very successful bulls!t artist, but full of sh!t none the less. 

His father was a preacher and hes read lots of "How to be supreme leader" type books.  

His QB decisions saying I look forward to Cam-then cutting him, picking Teddy dishwater and paying him 30+ million for one year, Picking Sam Darnold, passing on fields and Jones, bringing back Cam just to embarrass him, looking into Jimmy/Kirk "IR meh with great talent/coach" G/Cousins, having Walker on the 53 roster......soooo much fail and I know I missed some points 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, Basbear said:

My understanding was Peyton stole form every single system and formed his "own". He did change it up lots once Drew got older. Basically Payton did what smart coaches do, wonder why thats soooo hard to do?

All coaches do that to some level, but some are better at it than others.

Payton used primarily WCO concepts in his play design. His particular spin included a lot of natural picks. They concentrated on consistency more so than big plays, and he found the perfect quarterback to run it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Packersfan
      Seahawks or Rams

      By Packersfan · Posted

      Rams since you beat them already and they are 0-2 on the road against NFC South teams.
    • Pantherxtreme
      Seahawks or Rams

      By Pantherxtreme · Posted

      Let's say we take care of business against the Bucs and/or the Falcons take care of the Saints and we lock that 4th seed for the playoffs. Who do we root for this Sunday in the NFC West matchup with Seahawks at San Francisco winner takes the NFC West division. A Seahawks win would mean we face the Rams at home or with a 49ers win we host the Seahawks again.  Which opponent would most prefer? In the earlier Rams game we won primary due to turnovers specifically Mike Jackson pick-6 in combination with a good running game with Chuba and Rico whereas we kept the Rams offense off the field and Bryce was able to connect on two big 4th down throws for touchdowns. However when the Rams offense was on the field they pretty much got whatever they wanted, Williams and Corum gashed us in the run game, and we had no answer for Devonte Adams. Granted whe were missing some pieces on defense with Horn and Moehrig. Against Seattle our defense held it's own for the most part, it was our offense and turnovers which aided in the Panthers loss.  Seattle was the most stingy, best tackling defense the Panthers have played all season, and when we turned Darnold over we didn't do much with it.  The offense had no answers for what the defense was throwing at them and apparently were caught off guard by the amount of man coverage the Seahawks played.  With all that who do you think would be the better matchup the 2nd time around? I trust Stafford far more than I do Darnold, both running games are on par with each other, of the defenses Seattle has the dominant unit.  I personally prefer Seattle again, that would mark their 3rd consecutive road game, we've just played them, so we know exactly what to expect, and I feel Caneles should be able to come up with a better scheme to counteract what the Seahawks defense was doing, and we may be able to trip Darnold up, I don't want to try and win another shootout against the Rams.               
    • Shotgun
      Lowest Yards Per Completion...All Time.

      By Shotgun · Posted

      I remember watching him at bama and thinking he throws a lot of wobbly non spiral balls that have very little velocity. Knew it would be a real problem in the NFL and it is. 
×
×
  • Create New...