Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How dangerous is Willis as a runner? What makes him special?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Its a weird horse to hitch your wagon to considering everyone and their brother all acknowledge that he needs a LOT of work.  I dont give 2 chits if he can throw it a country mile or run over some white boy from some school named North Texas he is going to need extensive time and coaching just to be able to start an NFL game and even then its a crapshoot if he can become above average.  The offense he ran at liberty has been described as "elementary" and he didnt throw much in between the hashes.  He has so far to go its not even funny.  How many coaching staffs are goign to have to work with him to get him able to play?

It's kinda odd to me that all the talk about Trey Lance not even being close to ready doesn't have people backpedaling pretty hard on Willis. They just seem so similar as prospects IMO. If anything, Willis might even be more raw.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

What is your infatuation with Willis.  It's wonderful he can run fast.  We don't need a QB that can run fast we need one that can throw the ball.  ACCURATELY and from all I've heard he's not very accurate. 

This.

All these "running" QB's get figured out eventually and nearly always have a shorter shelf life than your pocket passers - or even your mobile but NOT running QB's.  I want a guy who even if his legs are failing can still scare the defense.  If John Elway or Steve Young were playing hurt / unable to run, they could still just kill you.

We need a bit of that around here.  I'm not convinced any of these rookies will be that, but Willis is the LEAST convincing of them all.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Its a weird horse to hitch your wagon to considering everyone and their brother all acknowledge that he needs a LOT of work.  I dont give 2 chits if he can throw it a country mile or run over some white boy from some school named North Texas he is going to need extensive time and coaching just to be able to start an NFL game and even then its a crapshoot if he can become above average.  The offense he ran at liberty has been described as "elementary" and he didnt throw much in between the hashes.  He has so far to go its not even funny.  How many coaching staffs are goign to have to work with him to get him able to play?

I mean I know you and a lot of guys who look at things the old fashion way can't see it. But the NFL is taking notice and things are in motion... teams are making moves and gearing up to make thing happen.. that usually means qb.. And no that isn't Pickett

Screenshot_20220404-165244_Plume.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's kinda odd to me that all the talk about Trey Lance not even being close to ready doesn't have people backpedaling pretty hard on Willis. They just seem so similar as prospects IMO. If anything, Willis might even be more raw.

 

I am thinking of it in the context of Rhules timeline.  We as a franchise cannot afford the luxury of drafting Lance/willis with the luxury of sitting them and trying to develop them.   Thats just not our reality.    A person like Fields, Jones or Pickett could probably come in day 1 and start.  Right or wrong that is where rhule and this franchise is at

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, micnificent28 said:

I mean I know you and a lot of guys who look at things the old fashion way can't see it. But the NFL is taking notice and things are in motion... teams are making moves and gearing up to make thing happen.. that usually means qb.. And no that isn't Pickett

Screenshot_20220404-165244_Plume.jpg

that is quite the reach you are speculating there.  Also other teams do dumb poo every year, it doesnt make it right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

that is quite the reach you are speculating there.  Also other teams do dumb poo every year, it doesnt make it right

It is speculating... but it looks a lot like what San Francisco did last year to aquire trey Lance. If you want to say Daniel Jeremiah doesn't know poo... that's fine. But it's easy to see someone falling in love with Willis's tools..  there is NO better option this year.. if you need to gamble on qb why not gamble on the biggest arm and fastest playmaker. 

Doesn't mean it's right or the right choice but it's definitely tempting.. 

Edited by micnificent28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Against scrub schools 

That's what I really worry about. All of a sudden everybody is big, everybody is fast, everybody is strong. Can you now play QB?

What in your game can you change to take it to the next level when you reach the next level? QBing. Guys that are already QBing like a guy with two consecutive seasons with 70% completions can jump in and produce.

If you're getting him for the purpose of running it's putting the cart before the horse.

Vick ran a 4.25 or something like that and Cam was/is a tank who builds up speed and trucks CBs, LBs. Cam did it to/against SEC talent. That's why Cam is/was elite and also why Vick was elite.

They were elite runners in their own different ways but were good/great QBs in the making. Both had to add advanced QBing to their obvious physical advantages as they became NFL veterans.

You can't be regular fast or regular big and have pretty ok accuracy and be ok at QBing and thrive in the NFL. 

Edited by rippadonn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

What is your infatuation with Willis.  It's wonderful he can run fast.  We don't need a QB that can run fast we need one that can throw the ball.  ACCURATELY and from all I've heard he's not very accurate. 

 except Willis isn't all that inaccurate which is why teams are falling in love with him

Screenshot_20220404-172321_Chrome.jpg

Edited by micnificent28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

That's what I really worry about. All of a sudden everybody is big, everybody is fast, everybody is strong. Can you now play QB?

What in your game can you change to take it to the next level when you reach the next level? QBing. Guys that are already QBing like a guy with two consecutive seasons with 70% completions can jump in and produce.

If you're getting him for the purpose of running it's putting the cart before the horse.

Vick ran a 4.25 or something like that and Cam was/is a tank who builds up speed and trucks CBs, LBs. Cam did it to/against SEC talent. That's why Cam is/was elite and also why Vick was elite.

They were elite runners in their own different ways but were good/great QBs in the making. Both had to add advanced QBing to their obvious physical advantages as they became NFL veterans.

You can't be regular fast or regular big and have pretty ok accuracy and be ok at QBing and thrive in the NFL. 

I mean if Josh Allen's rushing ability remained a threat at the next level why wouldn't Willis? Is he slower than Allen? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, micnificent28 said:

I mean if Josh Allen's rushing ability remained a threat at the next level why wouldn't Willis? Is he slower than Allen? 

A) Allen didnt run in college

B) Allen is much much larger then Willis

C) Allen and his development is an aberration far from the norm.   If you are hanging your hat on willis developing like JA then we are going to be in for some even more painful seasons

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

I mean if Josh Allen's rushing ability remained a threat at the next level why wouldn't Willis? Is he slower than Allen? 

You said yourself that Willis needs a lot of work.  Rhule's under the gun right now to win and doesn't have time to wait for a QB to develop.

Pickett or Howell are better choices if you ask me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...