Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers terminating Rock Hill project agreements


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:
17 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Like what?

 

He did make a deal with Rock Hill and lived up to his end of the deal 👍

Tepper to sizzle moron if he ever comes on this forum.. 

I was 💯 against Rock Hill giving any💰 to Panthers/Tepper and am 💯 against the Charloot City Council giving him a dime for a new stadium…

…why is this so tough to comprehend for you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Or the city realized that half of the promises that Tepper gave them weren’t going to come to fruition?

Rock Hill hosting the NFL Draft, get lost with that poo.

Tepper promised all these things to Rock Hill and it was all smoke in mirrors.

Did he?  I saw news articles stating that both the Panthers and Rock Hill wanted to host the NFL draft, but I haven't seen any news article stating that a promise was actually made by Tepper or the NFL.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TN05 said:

He didn't con anyone. The city of Rock Hill conned him by promising to pay and then refusing to do so. The fault lies entirely with the city here,

At this point I’m sure Tepper completely regrets rolling in the mud with those pigs…

…politicians 🤦‍♂️.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

The Spin Doctor jumps right back in. Tell us how this is actually good, and how bankrupt subsidiaries are a vital part of the Appaloosa Model

It would be a waste of time to (attempt to) explain the concept and strategic usefulness of bankruptcy, to you… 🤦‍♂️🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

It would be a waste of time to (attempt to) explain the concept and strategic usefulness of bankruptcy, to you… 🤦‍♂️🤣

Oh for sure. A litany of emojis and disinformation is just what I need to understand the concept of a scam artist strategically scamming people.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Oh for sure. A litany of emojis and disinformation is just what I need to understand the concept of a scam artist strategically scamming people.

You are uninformed and waaay over-invested emotionally, a bad combination…

…Tepper’s not going anywhere and in the interest of your own health you might want to step away — good luck 👍.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

You are uninformed and waaay over-invested emotionally, a bad combination…

…Tepper’s not going anywhere and in the interest of your own health you might want to step away — good luck 👍.

Sure he is. He's damn sure not staying here, and you've been scammed into believing otherwise.

🤣

Also the one who lives in this thread, spewing nonsense, is probably the one who's both uninformed and over-invested emotionally. Got an emoji for that too? 🤗

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TN05 said:

I don't believe in Tepper, but if Rock Hill wanted this they shouldn't have pulled a bait-and-switch.

Do you continue to go down the same path when it’s full of snakes and poison ivy and poo just because you’ve already been hiking that same path for a few hours? Probably not and neither does Rock Hill… they realized that Tepper’s playground wasn’t going to bring them what was promised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Like what?

 

He did make a deal with Rock Hill and lived up to his end of the deal 👍

Why do you keep asking me what options there are? It’s not my job to do what Tepper should have done in the first place and that’s finance his own playground in a location of his choosing. Or at the very least don’t promise Rock Hill a bunch of new jobs and concerts and the NFL Draft when in reality you are building a practice facility with some nice amenities in what is overall a underwhelming city.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...