Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, DamnItJake! said:

🙄 Defense!?? Can we draft a new coach while we are at it.. need a LT.. I get it though BPA if we can’t trade back..

What if the LT has a 88 rating and the DE has a 96 rating? Who do you pick?

Plus who is replacing reddick as a starter? Haynes??? 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Chief Keek said:

I can't see Fitterer not trading back, there's way too much value at that spot and they need all the draft capital they can get.

I hope he doesn’t.  I think people got too giddy about his trade downs last go round. 

take a premier OT prospect and call it a day.  You shouldn’t of traded away your picks.  Lessons learned.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Add up the draft pick value of our picks we've spent on offense vs. defense. 

 

Way to walk it back. You claimed "Under Rhule we've spent all our draft assets on D while trying to build an O off the NFL's trash heap." Which is categorically wrong.

 

After being called out. You want to bring out a chart. lol

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Way to walk it back. You claimed "Under Rhule we've spent all our draft assets on D while trying to build an O off the NFL's trash heap." Which is categorically wrong.

 

After being called out. You want to bring out a chart. lol

Cool. 😂

I thought it would be obvious that "all" didn't mean literally "all" but you do you.

But, you're done and you're not mad, right? 😂😂 😂

Do the math. I'll be shocked if it doesn't come out 4:1 D:O in a completely offensively driven league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Way to walk it back. You claimed "Under Rhule we've spent all our draft assets on D while trying to build an O off the NFL's trash heap." Which is categorically wrong.

 

After being called out. You want to bring out a chart. lol

We have had 5 picks in the first 2 rounds under Rhule and 4 of the 5 have been defense.  Including 2 top 10 defensive players. 

he is right.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Cool. 😂

I thought it would be obvious that "all" didn't mean literally "all" but you do you.

But, you're done and you're not mad, right? 😂😂 😂

Do the math. I'll be shocked if it doesn't come out 4:1 D:O in a completely offensively driven league.

 

Way to spin that BS. You are good at it. Have you ever in your life ever accepted you made a mistake? I don't think you could.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chief Keek Mentor

Chief Keek

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CRA said:

I hope he doesn’t.  I think people got too giddy about his trade downs last go round. 

take a premier OT prospect and call it a day.  You shouldn’t of traded away your picks.  Lessons learned.

If there's a top OT still there, that should definitely be the choice. Otherwise, in my opinion, trade back into the mid-range of the first. There's a lot of holes on this roster and this draft is loaded between rounds two through four.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CRA said:

I hope he doesn’t.  I think people got too giddy about his trade downs last go round. 

take a premier OT prospect and call it a day.  You shouldn’t of traded away your picks.  Lessons learned.

I think a big part is the team has more than 1 hole to fill. And about the only way to get more picks is trading that 6th. If you look at most drafts, trading comes to end after the begining of the 4th.......which the panthers have pick 137 thats 31 away form the start. That late 4th has nearly no trade value. So unless Burns/Brown/______ is getting moved(ultra rare on draft day), the only means to add multiple lotto tickets is trading the 6th overall for a teams 1st, 2nd, and 6th. 

Ick and Neal may not be there and Cross for me is not worth 6th overall when a stud edge is there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CRA said:

We have had 5 picks in the first 2 rounds under Rhule and 4 of the 5 have been defense.  Including 2 top 10 defensive players. 

he is right.  

 

AW, did you need to come to his rescue?

 

5 Offensive picks in last years draft. 3 well respect Offensive FA this year. But hey, you guys are the bomb.

 

You guys will spin anything to fit your agenda. Face facts, we have spend resources on Offense. And Georgie Boy said otherwise. Him wrong. But I guarantee he will not admit it.

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

AW, did you need to come to his rescue?

 

5 Offensive picks in last years draft. 3 well respect Offensive FA this year. But hey, you guys are the bomb.

 

You guys will spin anything to fit your agenda. Face facts, we have spend resources on Offense. And Georgie Boy said otherwise. Him wrong. But I guarantee he will not admit it.

hubby how are spending draft day? like food and booze wise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Dude is a monster. I honestly don't see how he isn't a a top 10 lock after testing out as an absolute freak. 3-4 NT, 3 tech, 5 tech. I think he can do it all.

Apparently some view him as a two down player. If he does end up being that, it would be a massive overdraft to take him top 10.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, CRA said:

I hope he doesn’t.  I think people got too giddy about his trade downs last go round. 

take a premier OT prospect and call it a day.  You shouldn’t of traded away your picks.  Lessons learned.

The level of jerking off over trading down is mystifying. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PantherChris
      Canes vs Islanders Game 5 Round 1 7:30

      By PantherChris · Posted

      The last goal was awful luck the second was too tbh    Chatfield tipped #2 in. And Freddie lost an edge 
    • tukafan21
      WAYY too early Top 53 Man Roster Depth Chart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      No we don't, if anything, I'd argue that WR is one of the more set positions on the roster at this moment for this coming season. We traded for Johnson to see if he can be a long term guy for us and to give Bryce a #1 who knows how to get open, he's locked in as the #1. Thielen was a stud last year and is locked in as the starting slot They think enough of Legette that we traded into the 1st to get him, he's locked in as the other starting outside WR as of now. This is year 1 of a rebuild, the coaches basically need to find out what they have in Mingo by the end of the year, because of that, he's also locked in as our 4th option, any lower on the depth chart and we might as well just cut or trade him now or his next season is TMJ's from last year. Giving Coker that signing bonus means they are all but expecting to keep him on the initial 53 (now, if he gets IR'd the first time he gets a paper cut, that's a different story, but it doesn't change the final 53 cut down math). ISM looked solid in the returner role last year, so unless they like someone better than him during camp, he's also got a spot locked up. So unless they plan on keeping 7 WRs on the initial 53, they likely only are looking for camp bodies at WR at this point, not someone they expect/want to find their way into the final 53.  And even if they wanted to keep 7 on the roster, at best we'd be looking for our 5th option. Someone like Jones may be an option once we get to the final 53 and then they end up IR'ing Coker as I expect them to do.
    • Day1PanthersFan
      Canes vs Islanders Game 5 Round 1 7:30

      By Day1PanthersFan · Posted

      That's why you don't declare a game over till its over, you jinxed us, Freddie randomly slipping on nothing is proof Jk, but seriously, in the playoffs no lead is safe 
×
×
  • Create New...