Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why the Panthers should take a QB (article)


Growl
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Growl said:

There are people here who want an OT simply because they want an OT and no matter how much information is presented to them, they will turn and hide and simply wait for the next thread to pop up when the tide may be more favorable 

whether or it’s lingering biases on roster construction “gotta build those trenches!” or just a generally risk averse nature and a misguided belief that OTs are “safe,” people have dug their heels in and no matter how many seasons go by, no matter how many developmental QBs get drafted and excel in front of their very eyes, they are going to want an OT because it’s an nfl fortune cookieism that Hog Molly=Good and so you can’t go wrong taking one.

 

There are people here who want an OT at #6 because this is an OT draft.....and we haven't had a decent OL in a long time.   Which is the key cog along w/ QB to have offense in the NFL. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

In the best case scenario that you just posted above, how many wins do you see with rhule coaching?

With Baker behind a good OL? If CMC is healthy for a majority of the games thanks to the OL? If McAdoo is a decent OC and Campen has our new OL playing well quickly? If Horn stays healthy and plays to his draft status? If YGM shows any growth/development? If Brown plays more like his rookie vs his sophomore year? 
-Hard to tell. Anywhere from dead last to squeaking in as a wildcard…

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

With Baker behind a good OL? If CMC is healthy for a majority of the games thanks to the OL? If McAdoo is a decent OC and Campen has our new OL playing well quickly? If Horn stays healthy and plays to his draft status? If YGM shows any growth/development? If Brown plays more like his rookie vs his sophomore year? 
-Hard to tell. Anywhere from dead last to squeaking in as a wildcard…

Lot of ifs just for a wildcard spot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Churning through jack offs every 3 years is how you become the Jets and Browns.  

We’re already in jets and browns territory lol 5 years without a (healthy) franchise qb. This team is literally being built the way you want it so I don’t know why you’re in this thread complaining that other people want it done another way. 
 

this team is definitely taking a tackle and going after Jimmy or mayfield and if the tackle isn’t there they’re definitely going edge rusher. I will be the first to eat crow if they actually have the balls to draft Malik at 6.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

There are people here who want an OT at #6 because this is an OT draft.....and we haven't had a decent OL in a long time.   Which is the key cog along w/ QB to have offense in the NFL. 

thanks for pointing out that having good players is good, anyways, back to the matter at hand

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheRumGone said:

We’re already in jets and browns territory lol 5 years without a (healthy) franchise qb. This team is literally being built the way you want it so I don’t know why you’re in this thread complaining that other people want it done another way. 
 

this team is definitely taking a tackle and going after Jimmy or mayfield and if the tackle isn’t there they’re definitely going edge rusher. I will be the first to eat crow if they actually have the balls to draft Malik at 6.

This team is in no way being built how I want it to be.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Centerfield said:

There isn't one good reason to take a QB this year

Not at #6.  Not when you just own the #6 pick and your next is a 4th rounder. 

if we had been accumulating draft captial like a rebuilding team should.  Then yeah, we should find a way to add QB talent.   But still not at #6. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Not at #6.  Not when you just own the #6 pick and your next is a 4th rounder. 

if we had been accumulating draft captial like a rebuilding should.  Then yeah, we should find a way to add QB talent.   But still not at #6. 

not this year. not with this group. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

It’s gonna be Pickett, fans are gonna have to accept that. We went to college teams pro days and only looked at QBs, it’s not gonna be anything else.

It’s not. I agree wholeheartedly with what TRG said. They’ve spent enormous resources on building the 1980’s football team that so many here want in accordance with Matt rhules archaic philosophy on football since he got here, and the fanbase will be the ones reaping the whirlwind, some of them gladly.

 

id love to be wrong but it seems pretty obvious they’re just gonna stay put and take the third best offensive tackle in the class, before drafting #10 next season when we’re all having the exact same discussion (well not me, pretty sure I’m done)

at this point it’s probably just best to hope the QBs don’t go to the teams you hate. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
×
×
  • Create New...