Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If only there was an available RPO expert QB to mentor Corral....


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

RPO is part of the pro game now though.  Nothing wrong with it.  

good teams are using the college concepts that their players used.  And it doesn’t mean an early Cam Newton version of it is the only option or you then have to go all old school pro.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

People are looking at this the wrong way.

When the team had Newton, they had two choices. They could teach him the pro game or just build an offense around what he already knew.

Under Shula, they built the offense around his college concepts.

When they scrapped Shula and hired Turner, they did what they should have done from the beginning and coached him up to the pro game.

The last thing I want to see them do is make the same mistake with Matt Corral.

That was my point. He doesn't need a mentor to RPO. We will use it some I'm sure. Especially bootlegs I'd imagine but he needs to learn how to play the position in an NFL style offense or they'll get him killed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm not about to ruin my groove on them today.  I'm just going to lie back and enjoy the sunshine for once.

I'm actually not mad about where we're at. My thing is they should let Sam walk and play the rookie or a vet like Cam.

If they play Sam it only hurts his value. Play the rookie and let Sam back him up. Unless we're bringing in a vet to win now while we redshirt Corral.

Corral has to play over Sam. The fans deserve at least that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

I'm actually not mad about where we're at. My thing is they should let Sam walk and play the rookie or a vet like Cam.

If they play Sam it only hurts his value. Play the rookie and let Sam back him up. Unless we're bringing in a vet to win now while we redshirt Corral.

Corral has to play over Sam. The fans deserve at least that.

Corral needs to play when he's ready to play. Fans should have nothing to do with it.

I do not want to ruin the kid just because Sam can't keep it together.  Leave him out of the equation for now. You're just going to suck it up like the rest of us and watch him one more season.

Seinfeld Soup GIF

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

Corral needs to play when he's ready to play. Fans should have nothing to do with it.

I do not want to ruin the kid just because Sam can't keep it together.  Leave him out of the equation for now. You're just going to suck it up like the rest of us and watch him one more season.

Seinfeld Soup GIF

Oh let's watch Sam Darnold another year.The Office Reaction GIF

Last thing we need is to coddle the man IF he's the future.

Last I remembered Sam was coddled and hugged and protected.

It's football. Man up or panty out.

I pee pee in soup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Oh let's watch Sam Darnold another year.The Office Reaction GIF

Last thing we need is to coddle the man IF he's the future.

Last I remembered Sam was coddled and hugged and protected.

It's football. Man up or panty out.

I pee pee in soup.

If he's not ready to play you want him starting anyway just to make you feel better?

Gtfo with that sh!t.

Sounds like you are the one that needs to nut up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthers Rhule said:

That was my point. He doesn't need a mentor to RPO. We will use it some I'm sure. Especially bootlegs I'd imagine but he needs to learn how to play the position in an NFL style offense or they'll get him killed. 

Pretty much.

If he needs a mentor to show him something that's just one element of the offense, then I guess we're going to have to bring in someone to help with screen passes, fade routes and other aspects too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...