Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rapoport says it could have been Pickett


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I trust Panthro.  He has shared many things over the years well before they happened.

That, and John Ellis also reported last night or this morning that Corral was the #1 QB on our board.

This is BS.

Being the #1 guy on the board doesn't necessarily mean you're the pick if, say, the head coach (who has final say) has his own motivation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Being the #1 guy on the board doesn't necessarily mean you're the pick if, say, the head coach (who has final say) has his own motivation.

Agreed, but all of the vibes we're getting out of the building indicate Rhule's say isn't as final, nor powerful, as it once was.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

Agreed, but all of the vibes we're getting out of the building indicate Rhule's say isn't as final, nor powerful, as it once was.

Valid, but remember Pickett was a guy Tepper wanted as well.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Panthro said:

He is 100% incorrect

Just so any of you know, Panthro is one of those cats who would know. If he says it, it needs to be listened to because what he hears happens. It's not a lot of stuff he hears, but when he hears and he shares (which sometimes is just with the mods) it is spot on. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

Just so any of you know, Panthro is one of those cats who would know. If he says it, it needs to be listened to because what he hears happens. It's not a lot of stuff he hears, but when he hears and he shares (which sometimes is just with the mods) it is spot on. 

 

Panthro said Willis was the top quarterback on our board.

Pretty much every other source says it was Corral.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Panthro said Willis was the top quarterback on our board.

Pretty much every other source says it was Corral.

I'll just say I've heard enough from Panthro to not doubt what he says. 

Now as far as Corrall vs. Willis vs. Pickett, it could be that the board was evolving and in flux throughout the process. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...