Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chances Matt Corral starts Week 1


Chances that Matt Corral is the starter Week 1  

221 members have voted

  1. 1. What is the chance that Matt Corral is the starter Week 1

    • 75%-100%
      11
    • 50%-75%
      34
    • 25%-50%
      72
    • Less than 25%
      104


Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, frankw said:

Apparently even Ellis is trying to post pro Sam Darnold fluff. The man is the Deputy Doofy of NFL quarterbacks. Get him out of here 👉💨

 

Optionality sometimes leads to misdirection. Last season they played with optionality and pulled Cam for Sam and interchanged and switched instead of making a clear statement.

If Sam was back why are you running a two QB system? If Cam is better @, then why don't you just roll with him for the rest of the season? They tried to go down two different roads simultaneously. Bonkers. Confusing.

If you are decisive and direct YOU know you didn't move a pick and next year's third for somebody your NOT going to play!?

Turn the page. Sam can if he wants to be a great mentor, starting QB on this team?! Everybody KNOWS who's job that is now. Why move in two different directions instead of one.

Everybody should know their role. Matt Corral came here to START, being a starting QB is how you begin that relationship. Everybody understands and works toward one goal, not two damn directions.

Everybody knows who the starter is and who the backup should be this season. If this is a rebuild then your pieces should be there in place. Why play/lose games without giving the kids some exercise?

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Not the full picture on that one. Ouch indeed tho

I like John's content not a call out or criticism just showing where we're at now. Worse than Teddy Bridgewater. Let's just flush this and get on with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, frankw said:

I like John's content not a call out or criticism just showing where we're at now. Worse than Teddy Bridgewater. Let's just flush this and get on with it.

At some point we all have to acknowledge that we are likely to Sam this year until something changes. If it was analytical then ok. If he was just being a little optimistic then ok. If it was Rhule level goofy then I would absolutely agree with you. I really haven't heard much from Ellis that wasn't at least a decent take or angle. Solid source that is respectable, agree or disagree. He is critical but fair. I just haven't seen anything outside of that.

Most wish we would but the new hope is that is what this year is for us.

Edited by Waldo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

At some point we all have to acknowledge that we are likely to Sam this year until something changes. If it was analytical then ok. If he was just being a little optimistic then ok. If it was Rhule level goofy then I would absolutely agree with you. I really haven't heard much from Ellis that wasn't at least a decent take or angle. Solid source that is respectable, agree or disagree. He is critical but fair. I just haven't seen anything outside of that.

Most wish we would but the new hope is that is what this year is for us.

Well give him a clipboard and some pom poms and let's see what Matt Corral has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This.  He knows where the seam is about to open, cuts, and accelerates hard. He’s slippery and tacklers always seem to be taking awkward angles to get to him. No dancing. Runs low and powerful. Almost never goes backwards for a loss. We’ve rarely had the guy who bounces off of tacklers. It’s nice seeing another one. 
    • I can't speak for others but yes I read it. The conclusions are based heavily around the use of the statistical metric DYAR created by football outsiders and used by ESPN for this article. It only includes players whose production began in 2000. But excluding HOF running backs who produced BIG in an iteration of the NFL that was not yet catered to making things much easier for offenses in order for them to prop up more recent candidates is rather absurd and seems like just playing favorites regardless of where one might fall on their opinion of the use of the metric in question. 
    • Same thing I first thought but then I saw it was against Jacksonville and took about half a second of playing to know. I was at that game.  I can't tell you my level of excitement when I saw it was Delhomme instead of Peete who came out for the 2nd half. Delhomme has and will probably always be my favorite Panther.
×
×
  • Create New...