Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don’t be surprised if this former panther becomes available


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Curtis best year is on par with the season that has made everyone hate Robby

That's not accurate. Take a look at Samuel's 2020 season versus Robby's 2021 season.

Curtis Samuel

samuel.thumb.PNG.594b52bbb1a562a3a1037ad79a0bf2a2.PNG

samuel1.thumb.PNG.dce75d81271e5efbfea626d6e5dc0520.PNG

samuel2.PNG.a73ce4ab6927d96f7d57da528341f3b9.PNG

 

Robby Anderson

robby_.thumb.PNG.6514e3ffbd68c666c06710a73249bf62.PNG

robby_1.thumb.PNG.9de6765595219226d67b021000936540.PNG

robby_2.PNG.b40394d4a25fc1303a6733aa384241f1.PNG

 

So, as you can see, Samuel performed better in almost all categories. Catch percentage(massive disparity), YDs/Catch, Drop %, YAC/R, etc. This on less targets, as well. And SIGNIFICANTLY less playing time. Robby was on the field for 85% of all offensive snaps, whereas Samuel was only on the field for 68% of snaps. So for Samuel to outproduce him as much as he did from being a slot receiver/multi-use player, that's pretty bad.

However, this isn't a very fair comparison at it's core, because we are comparing a player's literal best season in his career versus a player's literal worst season in his career. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Curtis best year is on par with the season that has made everyone hate Robby

Freezing cold take here dude, I’m going to statistically dismantle this. Robby this past season(in 17 games- 110 targets, 53 receptions,519 yards, 6.4% drop percentage, 50.5 rating when targeted, 48.2% catch percentage.) Now here are Curtis Samuels stats his last season here(in 15 games- 97 targets, 77 receptions, 851 rec yards, plus 200 rushing, 5.2% drop percentage, 109.2 rating when targeted, 79.2 catch percentage.) Curtis was more efficient and far superior in every receiving metric there is while also being a highly efficient RAC and in rushing downs. Curtis was a blast to watch on this team and the slander y’all give him is so unwarranted and so confusing why. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, shaq said:

Freezing cold take here dude, I’m going to statistically dismantle this. Robby this past season(in 17 games- 110 targets, 53 receptions,519 yards, 6.4% drop percentage, 50.5 rating when targeted, 48.2% catch percentage.) Now here are Curtis Samuels stats his last season here(in 15 games- 97 targets, 77 receptions, 851 rec yards, plus 200 rushing, 5.2% drop percentage, 109.2 rating when targeted, 79.2 catch percentage.) Curtis was more efficient and far superior in every receiving metric there is while also being a highly efficient RAC and in rushing downs. Curtis was a blast to watch on this team and the slander y’all give him is so unwarranted and so confusing why. 

It's also a comparison of a #2 WR versus a slot/multi-use guy. There is no chance could bring in Samuel to replace Robby because Samuel is literally not a #1 or #2 WR. He's nothing like that.

Frankly, they could very easily co-exist on the same offense. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I’d consider him as a gadget player. However, WR depth chart is so heavy at the moment. Not sure he would separate himself.

The first time they hand him the ball, the increased versatility he offers will become evident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I’d consider him as a gadget player. However, WR depth chart is so heavy at the moment. Not sure he would separate himself.

He's pretty much better than any player not named DJ Moore or Robby Anderson. None of the rest of those players would compare at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • FLA showed everyone it’s not about superstars. they bullied the best line in the NHL into obscurity. they played hard, were in the right positions, and ran over everything that got in their way.
    • That’s really not what you said and when I even expressed doubt as to your intentions with the post you doubled down and remained unclear on whether you were trying to drag Dean Smith for whatever reason. You just got the facts wrong, which if you don’t follow the local college programs like you say then maybe you just were mistaken and thought Smith didn’t win championships or have legit superstars, and that is ok, but you just doubled down when my first post was more corrective than anything. I’m not sure what you expect posting objectively false things like “RBA has a lot of wins with nothing to show for it like Dean Smith” (paraphrasing) on a message board with plenty of UNC fans. I’m not taking it as a personal affront, we can agree to disagree, Dean Smith’s legacy fortunately will not be affected by this conversation. Screw the (Florida) Panthers?
    • Bring in the free agents and trades.  Florida is the best team and unless Tulsky makes it happen, it’s more of the same…which isn’t bad…but it’s time to win a goddamn cup. 
×
×
  • Create New...