Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Article on why we should cut Darnold….am I wrong for being against this??

WarPanthers89

By WarPanthers89,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He was on the roster and he looked like the best QB in camp by far. But he couldn't do it on game day. Kinda like Darnold. Give up on Darnold, man. The Panthers have.

 

 

So what he was on the roster.. He was drafted by Seifert not Fox.. And had lost the job to Rodney Peete before Jake got here.. 

There was never a competition between Weinke and Jake.  Stop capping..

And again you Jr psychologist need to stop.  At no point in any of these post am I cheering for Darnold or Baker in this situation...

Reality check..

I would rather have the serial massage bandit if we could have gotten him..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Then Corral will beat him camp.  If Corral can't beat wrong way Darnold in camp (who didn't even look good in camp last year), then he's not ready to be the backup.

One issue is the QB coach and McAdoo trying to teach all 3 guys a new offense/verbiage at the same time. Corral naturally will probably take a little longer with actual play calling and probably won't get the attention/reps he needs for a while. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

If that happens then Great..

But Reality again..

Matt Corral is a 3rd round QB project.. Who most of the league knew would have to sit a year or 2.. 

If teams thought he was day 1 ready to be a starter he would have been drafted before the 3rd round...

I'm talking Corral compete with Darnold to be a 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

So what he was on the roster.. He was drafted by Seifert not Fox.. And had lost the job to Rodney Peete before Jake got here.. 

There was never a competition between Weinke and Jake.  Stop capping..

😂

If you're on the roster you're competing. According to you, we need to be playing the best practice players. I'm telling you, that was Weinke by miles. 

My point here is that your concept is dumb and you should stop digging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pimpdaddy Grand Master

Pimpdaddy

Posted
Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Stfu and use reading comprehension or just reading in general..

At what point did I say either were "good" QBs??.. Don't worry I'll wait. 

you said let them compete...compete for what? Sams 18 mill is gone , we already lost that.. Compete lol... Not much comprehension needed...Everytime you open your mouth you prove you're a pin brain...

Edited by Pimpdaddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted

Other hits on this and other Sam threads- it's a money deal. Doesnt matter if he takes a Baker type pay cut, its still 16+ mill

The whole NFL had Sam thought of as enigma/potential when he was a Jet. That 2021 season removed ALL the hope and his value tanked faster than Jimmy Biden. 

Best is to hold a real open QB battle and if a rash of QB injuries hit, listen to the best offers and go from there....Just like the Baker deal- HOOOOOLLLLLLLLDDDDD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

😂

If you're on the roster you're competing. According to you, we need to be playing the best practice players. I'm telling you, that was Weinke by miles. 

My point here is that your concept is dumb and you should stop digging.

Lol okay by your definition..

Was pickles "competing" with Cam to be the starting QB 2011??

"He was on the roster" duh!!

Don't worry I'll wait to see how you mentally Gymnastics your way into that belief..

Lmao

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Lol okay by your definition..

Was pickles "competing" with Cam to be the starting QB 2011??

Don't worry I'll wait to see how you mentally Gymnastics your way into that belief..

Lmao

Yes. If Cam hadn't been ready, Pickles would've started. Back to back 400 yard games out of the gate said Cam was more than ready.

If they'd gone by your standard, Pickles very well may have been the day one starter. Cam looked pretty rocky in preseason. Hell, he always did. Cam was a gamer much like Jake was. Way better on Sundays than in practice.

You're embarrassing yourself here man, but that's nothing new for you. 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Pimpdaddy said:

you said let them compete...compete for what? Sams 18 mill is gone , we already lost that.. Compete lol... Everytime you open your mouth you prove you're a pin brain...

And in the statement 

Let them Compete..

Where is the derived Sam or Baker support??

Lmao!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yes. If Cam hadn't been ready, Pickles would've started. Back to back 400 yard games out of the gate said Cam was more than ready.

If they'd gone by your standard, Pickles very well may have been the day one starter. Cam looked pretty rocky in preseason. Hell, he always did. Cam was a gamer much like Jake was. Way better on Sundays than in practice.

You're embarrassing yourself here man, but that's nothing new for you. 😂

The fact that Cam looked rocky in Pre season and still was day 1 starter proves it wasn't a "true" competition from the beginning.. 

You just posted a bunch of BS and prove my point..

Thanks ..

Lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...