Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Not buying the "good to great" characterization, but it's a plan


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

He's going into Year 3 of a 7 year contract. This was a tear down and rebuild. What happened last year was expected by everyone except blind Panthers fans.

That’s why he fired his OC and starting from scratch with new play book?

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CPcavedweller said:

He's going into Year 3 of a 7 year contract. This was a tear down and rebuild. What happened last year was expected by everyone except blind Panthers fans.

Yeeeeahh...no.

Matt Rhule's history suggested to everyone that he'd get a little better in the second year, even better in the third year, and so on.

One of the guys who was said to be expecting that second year Improvement was David Tepper. And per reports, he wound up embarrassed and disappointed by last year's results.

Truth be told though, Rhule's resume' doesn't actually predict a championship timeline because well...he's never won one.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole point of training camp and off-season is to get fans excited and get their hopes up so comes first game of the season each team fans will think they have a shot at the Super Bowl.  NFL actually does study and uses technique to get into fans head because they tend to spend a lot of money during that window on merchandise.  Some fans see thru this bullshit while others eat it up and beg for more.  Then they go into meltdown after 5th games of the season when reality sets in.  Then the following season they get manipulated again… and again.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tbe said:

By other measures we had one of the worst Ds last year.

People say that, but is it true? We were ranked in the low 20s for rushing and passing from what I found. 

I began checking different stats (like 3rd down efficiency), and I was surprised quite frankly. I mean sure, we could have more INTs (we were like 6th from the bottom). And Red zone efficiency (TDs only) was near the bottom (29th), but you can't look at all of this stuff in a vacuum.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Rhule is referring to average defensive starting position, he is wrong to say its the worst in 5 years.  The Bears were worse in 2019.  

The RZ stat, is a little arbitrary.   A TD scored on a play from the 21 is worth the same a TD scored from the 19.  We were the same as the Packers and better than Vegas in that stat, near the bottom of the league.

More importantly, we allowed a TD on 23% of all drives against us, which puts us at 12th in the league. 

We improved from 2020 but there's plenty of room for more improvement.

 

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Ja Rhule said:

For Tepper lovers

https://www.menshealth.com/health/a29214773/sports-fan-brain-science/

The free agency, the draft and training camp full of positive news all give you that dopamine hit and makes you feel soooo good.  Use common sense.

How do the chemicals work when you get angry every time Tepper or Rhule say something or do something you disagree with?  Asking for a friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ja Rhule said:

Google it, lazy ass

Anger's Allure: Are You Addicted to Anger?
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/culture-shrink/201508/angers-allure-are-you-addicted-anger

1. Human neurobiology rewards anger.
2. Anger is similar to other addictions.
3. Anger boosts ego fragility.
4. Anger may be familiar/comfortable and also a method of emotional avoidance.

#3 explains a lot.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Ja Rhule said:

That’s why he fired his OC and starting from scratch with new play book?

It's easy enough to find out if someone doesn't have what it takes. So it wasn't about getting better or not getting better this past year, it was about Joe Brady not having enough experience for the next three years. So cut bait now and grow the program with someone else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

It's easy enough to find out if someone doesn't have what it takes. So it wasn't about getting better or not getting better this past year, it was about Joe Brady not having enough experience for the next three years. So cut bait now and grow the program with someone else. 

Oh, I agree wholeheartedly with this idea 😁

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
    • 1st ⭐️ Big Bussi - 17 saves, .941 save % 2nd ⭐️ Logan Dankoven - 2 assists, 3 SOG, +3, 16:25 TOI 3rd ⭐️ Ghost Bear - 1 goal, 3 blocked shots, +2, 18:48 TOI
×
×
  • Create New...