Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thursday Panthers Camp Updates


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Splitting 1st team reps should be a little more balanced. Every other day has too many variables with weather and fatigue. Don't see how they can keep it 50/50 too much longer though

 

I know rhule hate is pretty common now but how has there been no evaluations yet? He’s basically saying they’ve wasted two days. Laziest Coach I’ve ever seen 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Sounds like Darnold is trying to win the job by not fuging up/checking almost everything down, and Baker is going all out no fear style. 

 

That’s been Sam’s M.O. his whole career. It’s Clausenesque the way he dinks and dunks the ball around. It’s what also could end CMC for good.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dxpanther said:

that's because we're talking about the post of being early! wtf.

 

it's nonsense and shouldn't even be a factor. it's literally just a wankfest fans to see who has the lunchiest lunch pail, bluest blue collar, suckiest suck-up mentality. it doesnt matter when discussing who's first on field by a matter of minutes. that's it. nothing to go off of.

if one of my reports shows up to an office meeting 15min early, im telling their ass to get back to their desk and answer some emails. no one is impressed by your gimmicks of wannabe leadership.

You're probably the guy.that shows up at 0759 for a 0800 work shift

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dxpanther said:

in the unlikely case you can't decide between two players, i'd really hope they would just have it decided by a foot race or three cone. giving it to the guy that puts his pads on and his shoes faster is just asinine to me.

We have limited access to the players' development.  Being first on the field is a symptom of an eager, competitive person who is ready to go.  For example, sitting on the front row in school does not mean you are getting an A, but more kids from the front row make As compared to those who sit in the back.  You do not give As to the kids based on where they sit, but it is a fair indicator of their work ethic.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

You're probably the guy.that shows up at 0759 for a 0800 work shift

im they guy the cares more about people's work and production and where they finish, than who's standing around on the field and stretching a whole 5 minutes before everyone else. 

it's pointless and useless information. like that idiot kid who was sleeping in his car in front of the stadium trying to prove how bad he wanted it. coaches and players dont care. it's just feel good bs for the fans and reporters.

 

i could do this all day haha.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

 

People keep bringing up how Baker didn't perform with so many weapons in Cleveland, but honestly 1) he did when healthy, as his 2020 season is severely overlooked by most, and 2) he did NOT have a weapon like DJ, ever.  Landry is a great route runner but most people on this board walk faster than he runs and OBJ has been living off of his rep from his first three seasons with Giants ever since...  he never had a WR the caliber of DJ.  And to be honest, when Robbie is ON, he is far better than Landry as well.  Baker is going to look better and better the more reps he gets and the more comfortable he gets with the playbook.  

Love the early results!

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Sounds like Darnold is trying to win the job by not fuging up/checking almost everything down, and Baker is going all out no fear style. 

 

It's the same garbage he did last year.  Smh...  I really wish they would quit wasting reps on him.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, trueblade said:

 

Not understanding this charade at all.  Yall had all last season to try BC at LT and you didn't want to.  But now, with a widely-regarded franchise LT on the roster, let's pretend we're gonna a play BC over him!

Only grace I'll give the staff is Campen wasn't here last year, so he may want a look at everybody, but other than that, fug all that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...